Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Berdasarkan Teori Kepastian Hukum

This study aims to analyze the criminal act of bribery corruption based on the theory of legal certainty. This research employs normative legal methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The main focus is to examine the extent to which the principle of legal certainty is applied in court decisions related to bribery cases, particularly regarding the consistency of norm application and judicial considerations. It is found that in several similar cases, there are significant disparities in verdicts, both in terms of sentence length, fines, and additional penalties, without clear and uniform legal basis. This reflects the weak implementation of the principle of legal certainty as stated by Gustav Radbruch. Therefore, a revision of regulations and clearer, more standardized sentencing guidelines are needed to create clarity, predictability, and justice in law enforcement. The findings are expected to contribute academically to improving Indonesia’s criminal justice system, especially in handling corruption offenses

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE)
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37676/mude.v4i3.8533
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Berdasarkan Teori Kepastian Hukum

Mohamad Yusuf, Syifa Nadya Azzahra, Yasmirah Mandasarih Saragih, Ummi Rachmi Pasaribu
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE)
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Berdasarkan Teori Kepastian Hukum

Mohamad Yusuf, Syifa Nadya Azzahra, Yasmirah Mandasarih Saragih, Ummi Rachmi Pasaribu
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal act of bribery corruption based on the theory of legal certainty. This research employs normative legal methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The main focus is to examine the extent to which the principle of legal certainty is applied in court decisions related to bribery cases, particularly regarding the consistency of norm application and judicial considerations. It is found that in several similar cases, there are significant disparities in verdicts, both in terms of sentence length, fines, and additional penalties, without clear and uniform legal basis. This reflects the weak implementation of the principle of legal certainty as stated by Gustav Radbruch. Therefore, a revision of regulations and clearer, more standardized sentencing guidelines are needed to create clarity, predictability, and justice in law enforcement. The findings are expected to contribute academically to improving Indonesia’s criminal justice system, especially in handling corruption offenses

Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE)Vol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Berdasarkan Teori Kepastian Hukum — Mohamad Yusuf, Syifa Nadya Azzahra, et al. · Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS