The biomechanics of working dog locomotion I: Steady-state trotting

The biomechanics of steady-state locomotion in different breeds of working dog is understudied, despite widespread use of these animals in multiple industries. It is unknown how kinematic and kinetic parameters vary between breeds and how these variations are potentially related to inter-breed variations in morphology. Here, gross morphology and trotting locomotion within a cohort of 27 Labrador retrievers ('labradors'), shepherd breeds ('shepherds') and spaniel breeds ('spaniels') were compared using motion capture, force plates and biomechanical modelling. Evidence for slight positive allometric scaling of limb and body lengths was found between the breeds, with relatively longer lengths seen in shepherds compared with spaniels. Significant between-breed differences in raw spatiotemporal parameters were found, with the larger shepherds trotting with greater velocities, stride lengths and ground reaction forces than the smaller breeds, although many of these factors scaled with isometry with respect to body mass when accounting for variations in trotting speed. However, gait cycle times and stride lengths did not scale isometrically with body size, which, taken together with significant differences in flexion-extension joint angles and moments, suggests that dynamic similarity during trotting is unlikely between these breeds. Overall, these findings highlight specific differences in the biomechanics of steady-state trotting locomotion between working dog breeds despite their somewhat geometrically similar gross body proportions. This suggests not only that should locomotion databases for individual breeds exist for future canine research, but also that breed-specific considerations should be adopted to maximise the health and welfare of these dogs in working practices, such as load-carrying tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250523
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The biomechanics of working dog locomotion I: Steady-state trotting

Suzanne Cottriall, James P. Charles, Thomas W. Maddox, Victoria F. Ratcliffe et al.
2 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Robotic Locomotion and Control
1.35
article

The biomechanics of working dog locomotion I: Steady-state trotting

Suzanne Cottriall, James P. Charles, Thomas W. Maddox, Victoria F. Ratcliffe, Karl T. Bates, Eithne Comerford, Roger W. P. Kissane, Isabelle Gooding
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The biomechanics of steady-state locomotion in different breeds of working dog is understudied, despite widespread use of these animals in multiple industries. It is unknown how kinematic and kinetic parameters vary between breeds and how these variations are potentially related to inter-breed variations in morphology. Here, gross morphology and trotting locomotion within a cohort of 27 Labrador retrievers ('labradors'), shepherd breeds ('shepherds') and spaniel breeds ('spaniels') were compared using motion capture, force plates and biomechanical modelling. Evidence for slight positive allometric scaling of limb and body lengths was found between the breeds, with relatively longer lengths seen in shepherds compared with spaniels. Significant between-breed differences in raw spatiotemporal parameters were found, with the larger shepherds trotting with greater velocities, stride lengths and ground reaction forces than the smaller breeds, although many of these factors scaled with isometry with respect to body mass when accounting for variations in trotting speed. However, gait cycle times and stride lengths did not scale isometrically with body size, which, taken together with significant differences in flexion-extension joint angles and moments, suggests that dynamic similarity during trotting is unlikely between these breeds. Overall, these findings highlight specific differences in the biomechanics of steady-state trotting locomotion between working dog breeds despite their somewhat geometrically similar gross body proportions. This suggests not only that should locomotion databases for individual breeds exist for future canine research, but also that breed-specific considerations should be adopted to maximise the health and welfare of these dogs in working practices, such as load-carrying tasks.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(17)
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Newmarket Equine Hospital (GB)
Royal Society, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.