HIV-1 bNAb Vaccinal Effect-An Underachieving Goal?

Reports of HIV-1-specific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs) medi-ating a potential 'vaccinal effect' implicate passively transferred bNAbs in promoting endoge-nous anti-HIV-1 immune responses. To date, three clinical trials have reported either increased anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies or T cell responses following bNAb administration to people living with HIV. Despite strong enthusiasm for this hypothesis, motivated in large part by its potential application to HIV-1 therapeutic strategies, the mechanism(s) underlying a vaccinal ef-fect remain unclear. Moreover, vaccinal effects on antibody and T cell responses are not consist-ently replicated. Partly, this inconsistency may be due to numerous difficulties in sensitively measuring a vaccinal effect in the context of human clinical trials. The magnitude of immune response increase following bNAb administration is generally modest, even when it is observed; a far greater enhancement of neutralization or T cell responses is likely required for a biologically meaningful impact. We review clinical and pre-clinical nonhuman primate studies that evaluated HIV-1/SIV monoclonal antibodies for vaccinal effects, with an emphasis on the strengths and limitations of these studies. Considerations for future studies investigating vaccinal effects are discussed, including appropriate comparators and specificity controls. Lastly, immune response characteristics of elite controller cohorts are outlined as potential vaccinal effect endpoints more likely to mediate HIV-1 suppression. As bNAb therapeutic interventions increasingly turn to combination approaches, including incorporation of immunomodulatory agents, attention to study design incorporating appropriate control groups, and relevant immunogenicity assays will enable more conclusive interpretation of vaccinal effects likely to mediate durable control of HIV. In any case, to date, the elicitation of vaccinal effects has been disappointing.