Optimal Design of Flat Carbon Fiber Composite Mirror

This study aims to achieve the optimal design of a carbon fiber composite mirror, focusing on minimizing mass and wavefront error (WFE). To achieve this, central composite design (CCD) was employed as the method of design of experiments (DOE) for sampling. Mass and displacement were calculated using finite-element analysis (FEA), and the WFE was determined using Zernike polynomials based on the displacement data. Metamodels using the response surface method (RSM) were created to predict the effects of design variables on mass and WFE. The results of the metamodels demonstrated high accuracy, with R2 values of 0.9978 for mass and 0.9561 for WFE. Multiobjective optimization was performed using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). To validate the RSM-based model, a comparative analysis was conducted with an equation-based model using flexural rigidity and mass as the objective functions. Flexural rigidity was selected due to its inverse correlation with surface deformations. The comparison of design variables between the RSM-based model and the equation-based model showed equal values for the thickness of the mirror panel, the thickness of the grid, and the height of the grid, except for a difference of 1.5 mm in the inscribed circle diameter of the grid. This result confirms the robustness of the RSM approach. When comparing the FEA results derived from the RSM-based model with those from the equation-based model, the mass showed a difference of 0.0057 kg, and the WFE showed a difference of 0.67 nm. Although the equation-based model showed slightly lower values, the differences were not significant. Additionally, comparing NSGA-II and FEA within the RSM-based optimal model, the error rates for mass and WFE were within 8%. The close similarity in these results validates the RSM-based model, suggesting its effectiveness in designing high-performance carbon fiber composite mirrors for aerospace applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-6092
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Design of Flat Carbon Fiber Composite Mirror

Ji‐hyun Kang, Seong-Min Lee Seong-Min Lee, Byung-Chul Yoo, Hee-Chan Song et al.
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
article

Optimal Design of Flat Carbon Fiber Composite Mirror

Ji‐hyun Kang, Seong-Min Lee Seong-Min Lee, Byung-Chul Yoo, Hee-Chan Song, Heoung‐Jae Chun, K.Y. Lee
article en

Abstract

This study aims to achieve the optimal design of a carbon fiber composite mirror, focusing on minimizing mass and wavefront error (WFE). To achieve this, central composite design (CCD) was employed as the method of design of experiments (DOE) for sampling. Mass and displacement were calculated using finite-element analysis (FEA), and the WFE was determined using Zernike polynomials based on the displacement data. Metamodels using the response surface method (RSM) were created to predict the effects of design variables on mass and WFE. The results of the metamodels demonstrated high accuracy, with R2 values of 0.9978 for mass and 0.9561 for WFE. Multiobjective optimization was performed using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). To validate the RSM-based model, a comparative analysis was conducted with an equation-based model using flexural rigidity and mass as the objective functions. Flexural rigidity was selected due to its inverse correlation with surface deformations. The comparison of design variables between the RSM-based model and the equation-based model showed equal values for the thickness of the mirror panel, the thickness of the grid, and the height of the grid, except for a difference of 1.5 mm in the inscribed circle diameter of the grid. This result confirms the robustness of the RSM approach. When comparing the FEA results derived from the RSM-based model with those from the equation-based model, the mass showed a difference of 0.0057 kg, and the WFE showed a difference of 0.67 nm. Although the equation-based model showed slightly lower values, the differences were not significant. Additionally, comparing NSGA-II and FEA within the RSM-based optimal model, the error rates for mass and WFE were within 8%. The close similarity in these results validates the RSM-based model, suggesting its effectiveness in designing high-performance carbon fiber composite mirrors for aerospace applications.

Journal of Aerospace EngineeringVol. 38(6)
Yonsei University (KR), Hanwha Solutions (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.