Dinutuximab Beta Versus Naxitamab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma in Patients with Stable Disease, Minor Response or Partial Response and Disease in Bone or Bone Marrow: Systematic Review and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Compariso

<b>Objective:</b> Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplification, disease type (relapsed, refractory), and disease site (bone marrow and/or bone) to balance aggregated characteristics of NAXI population. More characteristics were included in sensitivity analyses, including DB treatment without interleukin-2, as currently recommended. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as best response. <b>Results:</b> Aggregated data for NAXI from Study 201 (<i>n</i> = 52) and Study 230 (<i>n</i> = 38) and IPD from DB studies (APN311-202, APN311-304, <i>c</i> = 77) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to NAXI, DB significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS): hazard ratio, DB vs. NAXI of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.015). ORR was 60.1% (95% CI: 48.5% to 71.6%) for DB vs. 43.3% (33.1% to 53.6%) for NAXI (ORR odds ratio, DB vs. NAXI was 1.97, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.80, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Sensitivity analyses and unadjusted comparisons supported the results. <b>Conclusion:</b> In the indirect comparison, dinutuximab beta significantly extended PFS and increased ORR compared to naxitamab.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172723
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dinutuximab Beta Versus Naxitamab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma in Patients with Stable Disease, Minor Response or Partial Response and Disease in Bone or Bone Marrow: Systematic Review and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Compariso

Ruth Lydia Ladenstein, Dominique Valteau‐Couanet, Holger N. Lode, Torsten Ebeling et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
2.78
article

Dinutuximab Beta Versus Naxitamab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma in Patients with Stable Disease, Minor Response or Partial Response and Disease in Bone or Bone Marrow: Systematic Review and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Compariso

Ruth Lydia Ladenstein, Dominique Valteau‐Couanet, Holger N. Lode, Torsten Ebeling, Nikolai Siebert, Paweł Kawalec, Juliet C. Gray, Adela Cañete, Aleksandra Wieczorek, Roberto Luksch, Przemysław Holko, Isaac Yaniv, Sascha Troschke‐Meurer, Shifra Ash, Carla Manzitti, Alberto Garaventa, Katarzyna Śladowska, John W. Anderson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplification, disease type (relapsed, refractory), and disease site (bone marrow and/or bone) to balance aggregated characteristics of NAXI population. More characteristics were included in sensitivity analyses, including DB treatment without interleukin-2, as currently recommended. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as best response. <b>Results:</b> Aggregated data for NAXI from Study 201 (<i>n</i> = 52) and Study 230 (<i>n</i> = 38) and IPD from DB studies (APN311-202, APN311-304, <i>c</i> = 77) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to NAXI, DB significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS): hazard ratio, DB vs. NAXI of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.015). ORR was 60.1% (95% CI: 48.5% to 71.6%) for DB vs. 43.3% (33.1% to 53.6%) for NAXI (ORR odds ratio, DB vs. NAXI was 1.97, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.80, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Sensitivity analyses and unadjusted comparisons supported the results. <b>Conclusion:</b> In the indirect comparison, dinutuximab beta significantly extended PFS and increased ORR compared to naxitamab.

CancersVol. 17(17)
Université Paris-Sud (FR), Jagiellonian University (PL), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Schneider Children's Medical Center (IL), Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences (IL), St Anna Children's Hospital (AT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Southampton (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.