Combined Cycle Power Plants Water Purification Unit Life Cycle Assessment for Replacing Water Wastage

ABSTRACT The increasing global population has led to a growing demand for energy across various sectors. This increased demand is met by enhancing the capacity of power generation facilities, such as combined cycle power plants (CCPPs). As the capacity of these plants increases, so does the volume of water lost during power generation. Replenishing this lost water requires energy for seawater treatment, contributing to higher greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. These emissions exacerbate climate change—one of today's most pressing global challenges. Given that the environmental impacts of water treatment processes in CCPPs have been addressed in only a limited number of studies, the present research analyzes these impacts using life cycle assessment (LCA) at the Neka power plant in Iran. The assessment was performed using SimaPro software, with results presented for 18 midpoints and three endpoints according to the ISO 14040‐44 standards. The midpoint results indicate that for each cubic meter of treated water produced, the thermal method releases 8.85 kg of CO₂, while the reverse osmosis method releases only 3.2 kg of CO₂. Regarding the endpoint impacts, the thermal method results in final impacts of 0.0000355 DALY for human health, 0.000000122 species·yr for ecosystems, and 1.2 (USD2013) for resources. In contrast, the reverse osmosis method shows impacts of 0.0000536 DALY for human health, 0.000000374 species·yr for ecosystems, and 0.422 (USD2013) for resources. These findings indicate that the thermal water treatment process has lower detrimental effects on human health and ecosystems compared to the reverse osmosis process, making it the more environmentally favorable option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70261
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined Cycle Power Plants Water Purification Unit Life Cycle Assessment for Replacing Water Wastage

Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Reza Fattahi, Ahmad Hajinezhad, Shayan Mohammaddini et al.
1 citations
Energy Science & Engineering
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.00
article

Combined Cycle Power Plants Water Purification Unit Life Cycle Assessment for Replacing Water Wastage

Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Reza Fattahi, Ahmad Hajinezhad, Shayan Mohammaddini, Alireza A. Majidy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increasing global population has led to a growing demand for energy across various sectors. This increased demand is met by enhancing the capacity of power generation facilities, such as combined cycle power plants (CCPPs). As the capacity of these plants increases, so does the volume of water lost during power generation. Replenishing this lost water requires energy for seawater treatment, contributing to higher greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. These emissions exacerbate climate change—one of today's most pressing global challenges. Given that the environmental impacts of water treatment processes in CCPPs have been addressed in only a limited number of studies, the present research analyzes these impacts using life cycle assessment (LCA) at the Neka power plant in Iran. The assessment was performed using SimaPro software, with results presented for 18 midpoints and three endpoints according to the ISO 14040‐44 standards. The midpoint results indicate that for each cubic meter of treated water produced, the thermal method releases 8.85 kg of CO₂, while the reverse osmosis method releases only 3.2 kg of CO₂. Regarding the endpoint impacts, the thermal method results in final impacts of 0.0000355 DALY for human health, 0.000000122 species·yr for ecosystems, and 1.2 (USD2013) for resources. In contrast, the reverse osmosis method shows impacts of 0.0000536 DALY for human health, 0.000000374 species·yr for ecosystems, and 0.422 (USD2013) for resources. These findings indicate that the thermal water treatment process has lower detrimental effects on human health and ecosystems compared to the reverse osmosis process, making it the more environmentally favorable option.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 13(11)
University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combined Cycle Power Plants Water Purification Unit Life Cycle Assessment for Replacing Water Wastage — Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Reza Fattahi, et al. · Energy Science & Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS