Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the mainstay in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases. However, the performance of DPI formulations is highly dependent on the used inhaler device and the patient's inspiratory effort. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the aerosolization behavior of three commercially available capsule-based DPI medications-formoterol (Foradil<sup>®</sup>), glycopyrronium (Seebri<sup>®</sup> Breezhaler), and tiotropium (Spiriva<sup>®</sup>)-delivered using three different capsule-based inhalers (Aerolizer, Breezhaler, and Handihaler), under varying flow conditions. <b>Methods:</b> The aerodynamic performance of each formulation-inhaler combination was assessed using the Next-Generation Impactor (NGI) and Dosage Unit Sampling Apparatus (DUSA) methodology. Fine particle dose (FPD) and aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were determined at fixed flow rates of 15, 30, 60, and 100 L/min, as well as at inhaler-specific flow rates corresponding to a 4 kPa pressure drop. Chromatographic quantification of active ingredients was performed using validated HPLC methods specific to each drug. <b>Results:</b> The FPD values increased consistently with higher flow rates across all tested formulations and inhalers. At a 4 kPa pressure drop, Aerolizer and Breezhaler achieved significantly higher FPDs compared to Handihaler. Notably, in some instances, non-dedicated inhalers produced greater respirable fractions than the originally intended devices. APSD profiles revealed that drug deposition shifted toward smaller NGI stages at higher inspiratory flows, supporting enhanced deep lung delivery potential under optimal conditions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Device resistance, capsule orientation, and piercing mechanics substantially influence drug aerosolization. Although non-dedicated inhalers may offer improved FPDs in vitro, clinical use should adhere to approved drug-device combinations, as these have been validated for efficacy and safety under real-world conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091089
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI

Joanna Chałupka, Michał Piotr Marszałł, Kinga Lewandowska, Adam Sikora et al.
Pharmaceutics
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI

Joanna Chałupka, Michał Piotr Marszałł, Kinga Lewandowska, Adam Sikora, Paulina Drapińska
article en

Abstract

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the mainstay in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases. However, the performance of DPI formulations is highly dependent on the used inhaler device and the patient's inspiratory effort. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the aerosolization behavior of three commercially available capsule-based DPI medications-formoterol (Foradil<sup>®</sup>), glycopyrronium (Seebri<sup>®</sup> Breezhaler), and tiotropium (Spiriva<sup>®</sup>)-delivered using three different capsule-based inhalers (Aerolizer, Breezhaler, and Handihaler), under varying flow conditions. <b>Methods:</b> The aerodynamic performance of each formulation-inhaler combination was assessed using the Next-Generation Impactor (NGI) and Dosage Unit Sampling Apparatus (DUSA) methodology. Fine particle dose (FPD) and aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were determined at fixed flow rates of 15, 30, 60, and 100 L/min, as well as at inhaler-specific flow rates corresponding to a 4 kPa pressure drop. Chromatographic quantification of active ingredients was performed using validated HPLC methods specific to each drug. <b>Results:</b> The FPD values increased consistently with higher flow rates across all tested formulations and inhalers. At a 4 kPa pressure drop, Aerolizer and Breezhaler achieved significantly higher FPDs compared to Handihaler. Notably, in some instances, non-dedicated inhalers produced greater respirable fractions than the originally intended devices. APSD profiles revealed that drug deposition shifted toward smaller NGI stages at higher inspiratory flows, supporting enhanced deep lung delivery potential under optimal conditions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Device resistance, capsule orientation, and piercing mechanics substantially influence drug aerosolization. Although non-dedicated inhalers may offer improved FPDs in vitro, clinical use should adhere to approved drug-device combinations, as these have been validated for efficacy and safety under real-world conditions.

PharmaceuticsVol. 17(9)
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.