Efficacy of an Endoscopic Device Integrating a Sphincterotome and a Dilation Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis (with Video)

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The combined techniques of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (ESBD) and endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (ESLBD) have gained popularity for the endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, the conventional approach to these procedures requires two separate devices, a sphincterotome and a balloon catheter, which can complicate and prolong the procedure. We herein evaluated a novel integrated device combining a sphincterotome and balloon catheter developed to improve the efficiency of ESBD and ESLBD. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with choledocholithiasis who were treated using conventional sphincterotome and balloon catheters (<i>n</i> = 106) and those who were treated using the integrated device (<i>n</i> = 54). <b>Results:</b> Overall complete stone removal rates (99.1% vs. 100%) and adverse event incidence (12.3% vs. 13.0%) were comparable between the two groups. However, the integrated device significantly reduced total procedure time (40 vs. 27 min, <i>p</i> = 0.01), use of mechanical lithotripter (50.0% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), total number of procedures required. <b>Conclusions:</b> Complete stone removal rates and safety were comparable between the two groups. However, the novel integrated device may enhance the efficiency of common bile duct stone removal through ESBD and ESLBD because it eliminates the need to prepare and exchange separate devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14175930
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of an Endoscopic Device Integrating a Sphincterotome and a Dilation Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis (with Video)

Junichi Hanatani, Hitoshi Yoshiji, Koh Kitagawa, Tadashi Namisaki et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Efficacy of an Endoscopic Device Integrating a Sphincterotome and a Dilation Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis (with Video)

Junichi Hanatani, Hitoshi Yoshiji, Koh Kitagawa, Tadashi Namisaki, Shohei Asada, Yui Osaki, Akira Mitoro, Norihisa Nishimura, Kosuke Kaji, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Yuki Motokawa, Shinya Sato, Tomihiro Iwata
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The combined techniques of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (ESBD) and endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (ESLBD) have gained popularity for the endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, the conventional approach to these procedures requires two separate devices, a sphincterotome and a balloon catheter, which can complicate and prolong the procedure. We herein evaluated a novel integrated device combining a sphincterotome and balloon catheter developed to improve the efficiency of ESBD and ESLBD. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with choledocholithiasis who were treated using conventional sphincterotome and balloon catheters (<i>n</i> = 106) and those who were treated using the integrated device (<i>n</i> = 54). <b>Results:</b> Overall complete stone removal rates (99.1% vs. 100%) and adverse event incidence (12.3% vs. 13.0%) were comparable between the two groups. However, the integrated device significantly reduced total procedure time (40 vs. 27 min, <i>p</i> = 0.01), use of mechanical lithotripter (50.0% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), total number of procedures required. <b>Conclusions:</b> Complete stone removal rates and safety were comparable between the two groups. However, the novel integrated device may enhance the efficiency of common bile duct stone removal through ESBD and ESLBD because it eliminates the need to prepare and exchange separate devices.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Nara Medical University Hospital (JP), Nara Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.