Residual Characteristics and Processing Factors of Flubendiamide and Tebufenozide in Rice and Its Processed Products

This study aimed to evaluate residue changes in flubendiamide and tebufenozide during the processing of whole grain into milled rice, cooked rice, and rice cake, and to calculate their processing factors (PFs). For the processing study, pesticides were applied at three times the recommended rate based on Korea's good agricultural practice (GAP), and processed products were prepared using conventional methods. Residual pesticide analysis was performed using a modified QuEChERS method and LC-MS/MS. The residue analysis method was validated based on parameters including LOQ, linearity, and accuracy at the LOQ, 10LOQ, and MRL levels, with the LOQ set at 0.01 mg/kg for all samples. During milling, which removes the hull, more than 90% of the pesticide residues were eliminated. Additional reductions exceeding 50% were observed during cooking and rice cake processing. All PFs, except for those in the hulls, were less than 1, indicating that processing reduces pesticide levels. Despite the use of threefold the GAP rate, the %ADI values for all processed products remained below 1%, suggesting negligible dietary risk. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting the safety of processed rice products regarding pesticide residues and highlight the importance of considering processing effects in dietary exposure assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172925
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residual Characteristics and Processing Factors of Flubendiamide and Tebufenozide in Rice and Its Processed Products

Eun-been Oh, Seung-Hyeon Jo, Young-Jin Ham, Moo‐Hyeog Im et al.
1 citations
Foods
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
1.16
article

Residual Characteristics and Processing Factors of Flubendiamide and Tebufenozide in Rice and Its Processed Products

Eun-been Oh, Seung-Hyeon Jo, Young-Jin Ham, Moo‐Hyeog Im, Dong‐Ju Kim, Mihyun Cho, Hyeon-Woo Shin, Junyoung Kim, Kee-Sung Kyung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate residue changes in flubendiamide and tebufenozide during the processing of whole grain into milled rice, cooked rice, and rice cake, and to calculate their processing factors (PFs). For the processing study, pesticides were applied at three times the recommended rate based on Korea's good agricultural practice (GAP), and processed products were prepared using conventional methods. Residual pesticide analysis was performed using a modified QuEChERS method and LC-MS/MS. The residue analysis method was validated based on parameters including LOQ, linearity, and accuracy at the LOQ, 10LOQ, and MRL levels, with the LOQ set at 0.01 mg/kg for all samples. During milling, which removes the hull, more than 90% of the pesticide residues were eliminated. Additional reductions exceeding 50% were observed during cooking and rice cake processing. All PFs, except for those in the hulls, were less than 1, indicating that processing reduces pesticide levels. Despite the use of threefold the GAP rate, the %ADI values for all processed products remained below 1%, suggesting negligible dietary risk. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting the safety of processed rice products regarding pesticide residues and highlight the importance of considering processing effects in dietary exposure assessments.

FoodsVol. 14(17)
Chungbuk National University (KR), Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (KR), Korea Institute of Toxicology (KR), Sungae Hospital (KR), Solid (South Korea) (KR), Daegu University (KR)
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.