Comparative Efficacy of Two Hemostatic Agents in Post-Extraction Bleeding Control Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Adequate bleeding control is crucial in surgical procedures. Surgifoam and Hemospon are absorbable hemostatic sponges made from lyophilized porcine gelatin, commonly used in oral surgery. This clinical study aimed to evaluate bleeding control, soft tissue healing, and postoperative pain in dental sockets after mandibular third molar extractions filled with Surgifoam and Hemospon. Twenty-five volunteers requiring extractions of both left and right lower third molars participated in this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. After extraction, each socket was randomly filled with Hemospon (test group) or Surgifoam (control group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Bleeding at 30 and 60 min (Souto and Mühlemann scales) and soft tissue healing at 7 and 14 days (Brancaccio scale) were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Bleeding scores at 30 min predominantly showed no bleeding (score 0) in 80% of participants using Surgifoam, compared to 60% in the Hemospon group. No significant differences in bleeding were observed between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and both showed a similar reduction over time. Soft tissue healing was revealed at 14 days complete healing (score 0) in 90% of participants in both groups. No significant differences between Hemospon<sup>®</sup> and Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> were observed (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Postoperative pain evaluation showed highly variable scores on the first day (median: 2; range: 1-6) for both Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> and Hemospon<sup>®</sup>. By the seventh day, pain levels significantly reduced (median: 0), with no significant differences observed between the groups at any time point (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that Hemospon and Surgifoam are equally effective in bleeding control, healing, and pain control after third molar surgery. This research aims to guide surgeons on the clinical aspects of using these specific hemostatic sponges in post-extraction procedures for posterior molars and seeks to direct future clinical studies involving these materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Two Hemostatic Agents in Post-Extraction Bleeding Control Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

José Mauro Granjeiro, Mônica Diuana Calasans‐Maia, Giovanna Pesce, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende et al.
1 citations
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
article

Comparative Efficacy of Two Hemostatic Agents in Post-Extraction Bleeding Control Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

José Mauro Granjeiro, Mônica Diuana Calasans‐Maia, Giovanna Pesce, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Carlos Fernando Mourão, Massimo Del Fabbro, Madelaine Torres da Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adequate bleeding control is crucial in surgical procedures. Surgifoam and Hemospon are absorbable hemostatic sponges made from lyophilized porcine gelatin, commonly used in oral surgery. This clinical study aimed to evaluate bleeding control, soft tissue healing, and postoperative pain in dental sockets after mandibular third molar extractions filled with Surgifoam and Hemospon. Twenty-five volunteers requiring extractions of both left and right lower third molars participated in this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. After extraction, each socket was randomly filled with Hemospon (test group) or Surgifoam (control group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Bleeding at 30 and 60 min (Souto and Mühlemann scales) and soft tissue healing at 7 and 14 days (Brancaccio scale) were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Bleeding scores at 30 min predominantly showed no bleeding (score 0) in 80% of participants using Surgifoam, compared to 60% in the Hemospon group. No significant differences in bleeding were observed between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and both showed a similar reduction over time. Soft tissue healing was revealed at 14 days complete healing (score 0) in 90% of participants in both groups. No significant differences between Hemospon<sup>®</sup> and Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> were observed (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Postoperative pain evaluation showed highly variable scores on the first day (median: 2; range: 1-6) for both Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> and Hemospon<sup>®</sup>. By the seventh day, pain levels significantly reduced (median: 0), with no significant differences observed between the groups at any time point (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that Hemospon and Surgifoam are equally effective in bleeding control, healing, and pain control after third molar surgery. This research aims to guide surgeons on the clinical aspects of using these specific hemostatic sponges in post-extraction procedures for posterior molars and seeks to direct future clinical studies involving these materials.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 16(9)
Tufts University (US), Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), University of Milan (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (BR)
Universidade Federal Fluminense
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.