Mapping Orchard Trees from UAV Imagery Through One Growing Season: A Comparison Between OBIA-Based and Three CNN-Based Object Detection Methods

Extracting the shapes of individual tree crowns from high-resolution imagery can play a crucial role in many applications, including precision agriculture. We evaluated three CNN models—MASK R-CNN, YOLOv3, and SAM—and compared their tree crown results with OBIA-based reference datasets from UAV imagery for seven dates across one growing season. We found that YOLOv3 performed poorly across all dates; both MASK R-CNN and SAM performed well in May, June, September, and November (precision, recall, and F1 scores over 0.79). All models struggled in the early season imagery (e.g., March). MASK R-CNN outperformed other models in August (when there was smoke haze) and December (showing end-of-season variation in leaf color). SAM was the fastest model, and, as it required no training, it could cover more area in less time; MASK R-CNN was very accurate and customizable. In this paper, we aimed to contribute insight into which CNN model offers the best balance of accuracy and ease of implementation for orchard management tasks. We also evaluated its applicability within one software ecosystem, ESRI ArcGIS Pro, and showed how such an approach offers users a streamlined efficient way to detect objects in high-resolution UAV imagery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9090593
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Orchard Trees from UAV Imagery Through One Growing Season: A Comparison Between OBIA-Based and Three CNN-Based Object Detection Methods

Sean Hogan, Ewelina Jacygrad, Maggi Kelly, Shane Feirer et al.
1 links
Drones
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Mapping Orchard Trees from UAV Imagery Through One Growing Season: A Comparison Between OBIA-Based and Three CNN-Based Object Detection Methods

Sean Hogan, Ewelina Jacygrad, Maggi Kelly, Shane Feirer, Fengze Lin, A. P. Lyons
article en

Abstract

Extracting the shapes of individual tree crowns from high-resolution imagery can play a crucial role in many applications, including precision agriculture. We evaluated three CNN models—MASK R-CNN, YOLOv3, and SAM—and compared their tree crown results with OBIA-based reference datasets from UAV imagery for seven dates across one growing season. We found that YOLOv3 performed poorly across all dates; both MASK R-CNN and SAM performed well in May, June, September, and November (precision, recall, and F1 scores over 0.79). All models struggled in the early season imagery (e.g., March). MASK R-CNN outperformed other models in August (when there was smoke haze) and December (showing end-of-season variation in leaf color). SAM was the fastest model, and, as it required no training, it could cover more area in less time; MASK R-CNN was very accurate and customizable. In this paper, we aimed to contribute insight into which CNN model offers the best balance of accuracy and ease of implementation for orchard management tasks. We also evaluated its applicability within one software ecosystem, ESRI ArcGIS Pro, and showed how such an approach offers users a streamlined efficient way to detect objects in high-resolution UAV imagery.

DronesVol. 9(9)
University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.