Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts

Tandem cycling is a Paralympic discipline where two cyclists share one bicycle and requires synchronization and shared effort. In this study, we investigated how individual performance on a solo bicycle compares to tandem cycling. Twelve trained cyclists, that were unfamiliar with tandem cycling, completed a submaximal cycling test, a 30 s Wingate test, and a 10 min time trial under solo and tandem conditions. Performance metrics included gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output, heart rate, and cadence. The results showed that mean power output during the 10 min time trial was significantly lower on a tandem than on a solo bicycle (257 ± 66 W vs. 282 ± 80 W and p = 0.004), whereas cadence was higher (102.0 ± 7.7 rpm vs. 93.6 ± 4.7 rpm and p = 0.002). Gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output over 30 s, and heart rate over 10 min did not differ significantly between solo and tandem cycling. These findings suggest that although tandem cycling influences cadence and power, it does not reduce efficiency or short-duration maximal performance. Given the differences in power output and cadence, coaches and athletes should carefully interpret solo cycling performance metrics when applied to tandem racing and training, especially in novice tandem cyclists. Future research should investigate the role of power output matching and tandem experience, and further explore the interaction between pilot and stoker to optimize performance outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70032
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts

Thomas W. J. Janssen, Albert Smit, Mathijs J. Hofmijster, Ina Janssen et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Sports Performance and Training
article

Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts

Thomas W. J. Janssen, Albert Smit, Mathijs J. Hofmijster, Ina Janssen, Stephan van der Zwaard, Julia Boschker
article en

Abstract

Tandem cycling is a Paralympic discipline where two cyclists share one bicycle and requires synchronization and shared effort. In this study, we investigated how individual performance on a solo bicycle compares to tandem cycling. Twelve trained cyclists, that were unfamiliar with tandem cycling, completed a submaximal cycling test, a 30 s Wingate test, and a 10 min time trial under solo and tandem conditions. Performance metrics included gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output, heart rate, and cadence. The results showed that mean power output during the 10 min time trial was significantly lower on a tandem than on a solo bicycle (257 ± 66 W vs. 282 ± 80 W and p = 0.004), whereas cadence was higher (102.0 ± 7.7 rpm vs. 93.6 ± 4.7 rpm and p = 0.002). Gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output over 30 s, and heart rate over 10 min did not differ significantly between solo and tandem cycling. These findings suggest that although tandem cycling influences cadence and power, it does not reduce efficiency or short-duration maximal performance. Given the differences in power output and cadence, coaches and athletes should carefully interpret solo cycling performance metrics when applied to tandem racing and training, especially in novice tandem cyclists. Future research should investigate the role of power output matching and tandem experience, and further explore the interaction between pilot and stoker to optimize performance outcomes.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 25(9)
Royal Dutch Athletics Federation (NL), Sport Medisch Centrum Papendal (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.