High impact resistance with less material: a comparative study of Kagome truss and conventional rebar in concrete panels

This study experimentally validated a three-dimensional Kagome truss as a highly efficient alternative to conventional rebar for enhancing the projectile impact resistance of concrete panels. In this experiment, three types of panels with identical dimensions were fabricated: conventional RC panel (CP-2), RC panel with increased rebar (CP-4), and Kagome truss reinforced concrete panel (CP-K). High-velocity projectile impact tests were conducted to analyze the failure patterns on the front and rear faces, penetration depth, mass loss ratio, and damaged area of each panel. The experimental results showed that the CP-K panel withstood a greater number of impacts before perforation compared to the CP-2 and CP-4 panels. Furthermore, the CP-K panel exhibited smaller front and rear failure zones, less penetration depth, and a lower mass loss ratio. Notably, despite using a lower weight of reinforcement than the CP-4 panel, the Kagome truss-reinforced CP-K panel demonstrated superior impact resistance, establishing its potential as a material-efficient alternative for protective structures. • Kagome truss offers high impact resistance with less reinforcement material. • Kagome-reinforced concrete panels withstand more projectile impacts before perforation. • The 3D truss geometry provides more effective and homogeneous load distribution. • Kagome truss reinforcement reduces crater area and mass loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developments in the Built Environment
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100741
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High impact resistance with less material: a comparative study of Kagome truss and conventional rebar in concrete panels

Jeong-Il Choi, Se-Eon Park, Bang Yeon Lee, Eunyoung Hwang
Developments in the Built Environment
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

High impact resistance with less material: a comparative study of Kagome truss and conventional rebar in concrete panels

Jeong-Il Choi, Se-Eon Park, Bang Yeon Lee, Eunyoung Hwang
article en

Abstract

This study experimentally validated a three-dimensional Kagome truss as a highly efficient alternative to conventional rebar for enhancing the projectile impact resistance of concrete panels. In this experiment, three types of panels with identical dimensions were fabricated: conventional RC panel (CP-2), RC panel with increased rebar (CP-4), and Kagome truss reinforced concrete panel (CP-K). High-velocity projectile impact tests were conducted to analyze the failure patterns on the front and rear faces, penetration depth, mass loss ratio, and damaged area of each panel. The experimental results showed that the CP-K panel withstood a greater number of impacts before perforation compared to the CP-2 and CP-4 panels. Furthermore, the CP-K panel exhibited smaller front and rear failure zones, less penetration depth, and a lower mass loss ratio. Notably, despite using a lower weight of reinforcement than the CP-4 panel, the Kagome truss-reinforced CP-K panel demonstrated superior impact resistance, establishing its potential as a material-efficient alternative for protective structures. • Kagome truss offers high impact resistance with less reinforcement material. • Kagome-reinforced concrete panels withstand more projectile impacts before perforation. • The 3D truss geometry provides more effective and homogeneous load distribution. • Kagome truss reinforcement reduces crater area and mass loss.

Developments in the Built EnvironmentVol. 23
Chonnam National University (KR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.