The Social Fabric of Construction: Addressing Modern Slavery Risks in Material Specifications

Understanding the social performance of buildings is challenging due to the complexity of their value chains. Building specifications and material selections are based on performance criteria governed by construction codes, standards, and industry guidelines, yet they often overlook modern slavery considerations. Due to this oversight, practitioners and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) risk neglecting the social implications throughout the building's design and construction stages. To investigate how Australian building practitioners and NGOs perceive modern slavery risks in their material specifications, we conducted a bottom-up analysis of responses to analyse industry actors' experiences and identify factors that influence the respondents’ decision-making during material specifications. Employing a mixed methodology with 18 expert interviews and 230 surveys, our study used industry sub-domains of 1) education, 2) clients, 3) material procurement and 4) regulation. Our findings suggest that the risk of modern slavery in selections is generated due to inadequate regulation, limited product information, and constrained access to modern slavery information, compounded by a lack of knowledge, time constraints, and project costs. This could be addressed through improved education, increased client awareness, transparent procurement, and stronger regulations. Product and material specifications frequently lack human rights information due to opaque supply chains and restrictive legislation, fostering practitioner distrust in addressing modern slavery. The outcomes underscore that a comprehensive approach is required, targeting the industry sub-domains identified and further integrating circular economy principles within supply chains to overcome the trust deficit among practitioners and NGOs when specifying products with human rights considerations. This paper proposes an integrated approach to assist in fostering the commitment of NGOs and practitioners to address modern slavery risks within the building sector.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71427/iccpmce2024/16
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Fabric of Construction: Addressing Modern Slavery Risks in Material Specifications

Anwyn Shoemark
BIM and Construction Integration
article

The Social Fabric of Construction: Addressing Modern Slavery Risks in Material Specifications

Anwyn Shoemark
article en

Abstract

Understanding the social performance of buildings is challenging due to the complexity of their value chains. Building specifications and material selections are based on performance criteria governed by construction codes, standards, and industry guidelines, yet they often overlook modern slavery considerations. Due to this oversight, practitioners and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) risk neglecting the social implications throughout the building's design and construction stages. To investigate how Australian building practitioners and NGOs perceive modern slavery risks in their material specifications, we conducted a bottom-up analysis of responses to analyse industry actors' experiences and identify factors that influence the respondents’ decision-making during material specifications. Employing a mixed methodology with 18 expert interviews and 230 surveys, our study used industry sub-domains of 1) education, 2) clients, 3) material procurement and 4) regulation. Our findings suggest that the risk of modern slavery in selections is generated due to inadequate regulation, limited product information, and constrained access to modern slavery information, compounded by a lack of knowledge, time constraints, and project costs. This could be addressed through improved education, increased client awareness, transparent procurement, and stronger regulations. Product and material specifications frequently lack human rights information due to opaque supply chains and restrictive legislation, fostering practitioner distrust in addressing modern slavery. The outcomes underscore that a comprehensive approach is required, targeting the industry sub-domains identified and further integrating circular economy principles within supply chains to overcome the trust deficit among practitioners and NGOs when specifying products with human rights considerations. This paper proposes an integrated approach to assist in fostering the commitment of NGOs and practitioners to address modern slavery risks within the building sector.

Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.