High-Performance Automated Detection of Sheep Binocular Eye Temperatures and Their Correlation with Rectal Temperature

Although rectal temperature is reliable, its measurement requires manual handling and causes stress to animals. IRT provides a non-contact alternative but often ignores bilateral eye temperature differences. This study presents an E-S-YOLO11n model for the automated detection of the binocular regions of sheep, which achieves remarkable performance with a precision of 98.2%, recall of 98.5%, <i>mAP</i>@0.5 of 99.40%, <i>F</i><sub>1</sub> score of 98.35%, FPS of 322.58 frame/s, parameters of 7.27 M, model size of 3.97 MB, and GFLOPs of 1.38. Right and left eye temperatures exhibit a strong correlation (r = 0.8076, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), However, the eye temperatures show only very weak correlation with rectal temperature (right eye: r = 0.0852; left eye: r = -0.0359), and neither figure reaches statistical significance. Rectal temperature is 7.37% and 7.69% higher than the right and left eye temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the right eye temperature is slightly higher than the left eye (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The study demonstrates the feasibility of combining IRT and deep learning for non-invasive eye temperature monitoring, although environmental factors may limit it as a proxy for rectal temperature. These results support the development of efficient thermal monitoring tools for precision animal husbandry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172475
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Performance Automated Detection of Sheep Binocular Eye Temperatures and Their Correlation with Rectal Temperature

Jun Wang, Yadan Zhang, Waleid Mohamed El-Sayed Shakweer, Gang Liu et al.
Animals
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

High-Performance Automated Detection of Sheep Binocular Eye Temperatures and Their Correlation with Rectal Temperature

Jun Wang, Yadan Zhang, Waleid Mohamed El-Sayed Shakweer, Gang Liu, Xueting Zeng, Xiaocong Li, Han Ying
article en

Abstract

Although rectal temperature is reliable, its measurement requires manual handling and causes stress to animals. IRT provides a non-contact alternative but often ignores bilateral eye temperature differences. This study presents an E-S-YOLO11n model for the automated detection of the binocular regions of sheep, which achieves remarkable performance with a precision of 98.2%, recall of 98.5%, <i>mAP</i>@0.5 of 99.40%, <i>F</i><sub>1</sub> score of 98.35%, FPS of 322.58 frame/s, parameters of 7.27 M, model size of 3.97 MB, and GFLOPs of 1.38. Right and left eye temperatures exhibit a strong correlation (r = 0.8076, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), However, the eye temperatures show only very weak correlation with rectal temperature (right eye: r = 0.0852; left eye: r = -0.0359), and neither figure reaches statistical significance. Rectal temperature is 7.37% and 7.69% higher than the right and left eye temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the right eye temperature is slightly higher than the left eye (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The study demonstrates the feasibility of combining IRT and deep learning for non-invasive eye temperature monitoring, although environmental factors may limit it as a proxy for rectal temperature. These results support the development of efficient thermal monitoring tools for precision animal husbandry.

AnimalsVol. 15(17)
Henan University of Science and Technology (CN), National Research Centre (EG), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
China Agricultural University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.