Spatially explicit estimates of global population potential for leopard (Panthera pardus)

Abstract Many studies have assessed local densities of threatened carnivore species, but few have synthesized existing data into range-wide estimates based on habitat potential. Identifying where observed densities differ from expected values may help focus conservation attention. Herein, we related published leopard density estimates and a random selection of 0 values from across their extirpated range ( N = 209) to environmental and anthropogenic drivers. We then produced a spatially explicit estimate of expected density throughout the contemporary range of this species. We compared 16 candidate models that weighed density estimates by the inverse of their standard error, controlled for study design effects, and included spatial covariates at their optimal scale as determined by Akaike’s Information Criterion. Expected leopard density ranged from 0 to 8 individuals/100 km 2 and was positively and strongly related to the proportion of protected area at the 5-km scale, less so to the proportion of developed land cover (5-km), and negatively associated with human density (1-km), temperature (20-km), and longitude. Prediction error ranged from 0 to 12 leopards/100 km 2 , being greatest in India and its bordering countries. Overall, our model produced an expected value of 131,300 (42,692–428,498 95% CI) leopards globally. We predicted high expected densities in southern and eastern Africa where many published studies originate. Central and West Africa also hold high potential but lack estimates. Fine-scale variables and legacies of armed conflict that have depleted biodiversity should be considered when evaluating contemporary species status, and our predictions may highlight areas where conservation action could be most effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03131-9
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatially explicit estimates of global population potential for leopard (Panthera pardus)

Luke Hunter, Jacqueline L. Frair, Lisanne S. Petracca, Sandy A. Slovikosky
Biodiversity and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Spatially explicit estimates of global population potential for leopard (Panthera pardus)

Luke Hunter, Jacqueline L. Frair, Lisanne S. Petracca, Sandy A. Slovikosky
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many studies have assessed local densities of threatened carnivore species, but few have synthesized existing data into range-wide estimates based on habitat potential. Identifying where observed densities differ from expected values may help focus conservation attention. Herein, we related published leopard density estimates and a random selection of 0 values from across their extirpated range ( N = 209) to environmental and anthropogenic drivers. We then produced a spatially explicit estimate of expected density throughout the contemporary range of this species. We compared 16 candidate models that weighed density estimates by the inverse of their standard error, controlled for study design effects, and included spatial covariates at their optimal scale as determined by Akaike’s Information Criterion. Expected leopard density ranged from 0 to 8 individuals/100 km 2 and was positively and strongly related to the proportion of protected area at the 5-km scale, less so to the proportion of developed land cover (5-km), and negatively associated with human density (1-km), temperature (20-km), and longitude. Prediction error ranged from 0 to 12 leopards/100 km 2 , being greatest in India and its bordering countries. Overall, our model produced an expected value of 131,300 (42,692–428,498 95% CI) leopards globally. We predicted high expected densities in southern and eastern Africa where many published studies originate. Central and West Africa also hold high potential but lack estimates. Fine-scale variables and legacies of armed conflict that have depleted biodiversity should be considered when evaluating contemporary species status, and our predictions may highlight areas where conservation action could be most effective.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 34(11)
Mansfield University (US), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.