Prediction and control of structured porosity in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing using multi-scale modeling

Increasing hatch spacing from 0.061 mm to 0.115 mm increases porosity from ∼25% to ∼53%, producing mesh-like pore structures confirmed by CT and simulations. • A robust multi-scale modeling framework for predicting and controlling process-induced porosity in LPBF, validated across diverse process conditions considering 17-4PH stainless steel. • The conduction model shows the highest error (∼24 % MAE), while the hybrid and multiphysics models reduce it to ∼ 19 % and < 2 %, respectively. • The hybrid model, using adjusted 2D melt pool geometry, improves accuracy over the conduction model by 4.4%. • The multiphysics model, including melt pool flow, surface tension, and partially molten particles, predicts porosity within 5 % of CT measurements across laser energy densities of 11.6–28.5 J/mm 3 . • Inclusion of partially molten particles reduces porosity prediction error by 17–26%, especially in low-energy, high-hatch-spacing conditions. • Laser energy density and hatch spacing significantly affect pore connectivity and truss-like morphologies. This study presents a comprehensive multi-scale modeling framework for predicting and controlling process-induced porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. Three numerical approaches are developed and evaluated: a conduction-based finite element model, a hybrid geometric model with melt pool dimensions, and a multiphysics model. The use of partially molten powder particles is a significant innovation that improves prediction accuracy for porosity and surface morphology, especially under low-energy and high-hatch-spacing conditions. Model validation is carried out using high-resolution CT scans, SEM imaging, and buoyancy-based porosity measurements. The conduction and hybrid models offer computational efficiency and are appropriate for macro- to meso -scale investigations, but they have limited ability to capture precise pore morphology. The multiphysics model, incorporating melt pool fluid flow, surface tension effects, and partially molten powder particles, achieved porosity prediction within 5 % deviation of CT-based experimental values and closely matches observed pore structures across a range of laser energy densities (11.6–28.5 J/mm 3 ). The study also maps process-structure interactions, emphasizing the impact of laser energy density and hatch spacing on pore properties. Overall, the proposed novel framework serves as a prediction and design tool for adjusting porosity in LPBF components to meet application-specific performance requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials & Design
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114627
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction and control of structured porosity in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing using multi-scale modeling

Abul Fazal M. Arif, Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Syed Sohail Akhtar, Aazim Shafi Lone et al.
4 citations
Materials & Design
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
article

Prediction and control of structured porosity in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing using multi-scale modeling

Abul Fazal M. Arif, Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Syed Sohail Akhtar, Aazim Shafi Lone, Abdul Qadeer, Abba A. Ababakar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Increasing hatch spacing from 0.061 mm to 0.115 mm increases porosity from ∼25% to ∼53%, producing mesh-like pore structures confirmed by CT and simulations. • A robust multi-scale modeling framework for predicting and controlling process-induced porosity in LPBF, validated across diverse process conditions considering 17-4PH stainless steel. • The conduction model shows the highest error (∼24 % MAE), while the hybrid and multiphysics models reduce it to ∼ 19 % and < 2 %, respectively. • The hybrid model, using adjusted 2D melt pool geometry, improves accuracy over the conduction model by 4.4%. • The multiphysics model, including melt pool flow, surface tension, and partially molten particles, predicts porosity within 5 % of CT measurements across laser energy densities of 11.6–28.5 J/mm 3 . • Inclusion of partially molten particles reduces porosity prediction error by 17–26%, especially in low-energy, high-hatch-spacing conditions. • Laser energy density and hatch spacing significantly affect pore connectivity and truss-like morphologies. This study presents a comprehensive multi-scale modeling framework for predicting and controlling process-induced porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. Three numerical approaches are developed and evaluated: a conduction-based finite element model, a hybrid geometric model with melt pool dimensions, and a multiphysics model. The use of partially molten powder particles is a significant innovation that improves prediction accuracy for porosity and surface morphology, especially under low-energy and high-hatch-spacing conditions. Model validation is carried out using high-resolution CT scans, SEM imaging, and buoyancy-based porosity measurements. The conduction and hybrid models offer computational efficiency and are appropriate for macro- to meso -scale investigations, but they have limited ability to capture precise pore morphology. The multiphysics model, incorporating melt pool fluid flow, surface tension effects, and partially molten powder particles, achieved porosity prediction within 5 % deviation of CT-based experimental values and closely matches observed pore structures across a range of laser energy densities (11.6–28.5 J/mm 3 ). The study also maps process-structure interactions, emphasizing the impact of laser energy density and hatch spacing on pore properties. Overall, the proposed novel framework serves as a prediction and design tool for adjusting porosity in LPBF components to meet application-specific performance requirements.

Materials & DesignVol. 258
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of Alberta (CA)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.