AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges

Information fusion, in the context of the Generative AI era, must distinguish AI Agents from Agentic AI. This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. We begin by outlining the search strategy and foundational definitions, characterizing AI Agents as modular systems driven and enabled by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation. Generative AI is positioned as a precursor providing the foundation, with AI agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. We then characterize Agentic AI systems, which, in contrast to AI Agents, represent a paradigm shift marked by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels, we present a comparative analysis across both AI agents and agentic AI paradigms. Application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support, scheduling, and data summarization are then contrasted with Agentic AI deployments in research automation, robotic coordination, and medical decision support. We further examine unique challenges in each paradigm including hallucination, brittleness, emergent behavior, and coordination failure, and propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling. This work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, and explainable AI-driven systems. • First conceptual taxonomy that distinguishes AI Agents and Agentic AI. • Provides functional operation mapping of Agentic AI. • Analyzes modular agents to orchestrated, memory persistent Agentic AI. • Compares applications of Agentic AI across various domains. • Identifies challenges of current Agentic AI and proposes solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Fusion
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599
Citations
57
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
141.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges

Manoj Karkee, Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis
57 citations
Information Fusion
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
141.41
article

AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges

Manoj Karkee, Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis
article en
57 citations

Abstract

Information fusion, in the context of the Generative AI era, must distinguish AI Agents from Agentic AI. This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. We begin by outlining the search strategy and foundational definitions, characterizing AI Agents as modular systems driven and enabled by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation. Generative AI is positioned as a precursor providing the foundation, with AI agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. We then characterize Agentic AI systems, which, in contrast to AI Agents, represent a paradigm shift marked by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels, we present a comparative analysis across both AI agents and agentic AI paradigms. Application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support, scheduling, and data summarization are then contrasted with Agentic AI deployments in research automation, robotic coordination, and medical decision support. We further examine unique challenges in each paradigm including hallucination, brittleness, emergent behavior, and coordination failure, and propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling. This work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, and explainable AI-driven systems. • First conceptual taxonomy that distinguishes AI Agents and Agentic AI. • Provides functional operation mapping of Agentic AI. • Analyzes modular agents to orchestrated, memory persistent Agentic AI. • Compares applications of Agentic AI across various domains. • Identifies challenges of current Agentic AI and proposes solutions.

Information FusionVol. 126
University of Peloponnese (GR), Cornell University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
141.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.