‘We Owe It to Our Children to Use All Means to Prevent Future Abuse’: The Political Rationale and Arguments Behind Denmark’s First ‘Sex Offender Law’

Abstract In 2020, Denmark introduced its first ‘Sex Offender Law’ to protect children by monitoring convicted offenders and restricting their liberty. The law sparked controversy due to Denmark’s strong tradition of upholding the rule of law. This article explores the political rationale and arguments behind its adoption. Through a content analysis of 161 documents, including political texts and legislative debates, it reveals that the law relies more on lawmakers’ assumptions than on evidence. It also shows how lawmakers sidestep fundamental rights by framing the law as preventive, using storytelling and ‘playing’ with legal concepts. The article emphasizes the need for a balance between protecting children and safeguarding fundamental rights to preserve Denmark’s reputation as a nation governed by the rule of law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf076
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘We Owe It to Our Children to Use All Means to Prevent Future Abuse’: The Political Rationale and Arguments Behind Denmark’s First ‘Sex Offender Law’

Annette Olesen, Kasper Jørgensen
The British Journal of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

‘We Owe It to Our Children to Use All Means to Prevent Future Abuse’: The Political Rationale and Arguments Behind Denmark’s First ‘Sex Offender Law’

Annette Olesen, Kasper Jørgensen
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2020, Denmark introduced its first ‘Sex Offender Law’ to protect children by monitoring convicted offenders and restricting their liberty. The law sparked controversy due to Denmark’s strong tradition of upholding the rule of law. This article explores the political rationale and arguments behind its adoption. Through a content analysis of 161 documents, including political texts and legislative debates, it reveals that the law relies more on lawmakers’ assumptions than on evidence. It also shows how lawmakers sidestep fundamental rights by framing the law as preventive, using storytelling and ‘playing’ with legal concepts. The article emphasizes the need for a balance between protecting children and safeguarding fundamental rights to preserve Denmark’s reputation as a nation governed by the rule of law.

The British Journal of Criminology
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.