Comparative Profiling of Withanolides in Tissues of <i>Withania somnifera</i> and <i>Datura metel</i> Using UHPLC–MS/MS
Withania somnifera and Datura metel, two medicinally significant members of the Solanaceae family, are known for their content of pharmacologically active withanolides. This study investigates the structural diversity and tissue-specific distribution of withanolides in these species using UHPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Identified 36 distinct withanolides based on characteristic MS/MS fragmentation patterns and accurate mass measurements. Glycosidic linkages in withanosides were recognized through neutral losses of 162, 324, and 486 Da, indicating the presence of mono-, di-, and tri-glycone moieties, whereas two to three water losses were commonly observed from the genin units. A total of 21 isomeric compounds were differentiated by their chromatographic elution profiles and MS/MS fragmentation. However, Withanoside IV, Withaferin A, Withanoside V, Withanone, and Withanolide B were confirmed with the reference standards. Notably, leaves exhibited the highest structural diversity among the analyzed tissues (leaves, stems, fruits, and roots). Given the commercial importance yet non-renewable parts, Withania roots, and the traditional use of Datura leaves in ethnomedicine, this study highlights the leaf as a rich and sustainable source of structurally diverse withanolides for potential therapeutic applications and exploration.
Authors
- Dipak Kumar Mishra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-2685)
- Sanjeev Kanojiya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-2797)
- Mohsin Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7407-6513)
- Ashish Kumar Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3534-9010)
Institutions
- Central Drug Research Institute (IN)
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Chemistry & Biodiversity
- Published
- 2025-08-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202501319
- Primary Topic
- Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00