Traces of additive manufacturing in early iron age anthropomorphic pendants

• Non-invasive X-ray µCT reveals manufacturing techniques in Iron Age bronze pendants. • SEM-EDX analysis uncovers alloy differences in Oenotrian pendants Type A and Type B . • Detailed post-casting processes distinguish elite-targeted Type A pendants. • Mass-produced Type B pendants linked to high-tin bronze and bivalve molds. • Study highlights Oenotrian-Sicilian cultural interplay through symbolic artifacts. Bronze pendants depicting anthropomorphic couples, dating back to the 8th century BC, were found in several protohistoric sites in Calabria. The historical and cultural context of the archaeological finds is linked to the Oenotrians, a population that settled in Southern Italy before Greek colonization. We present the results of the investigation on two bronze pendants dating back to the early Iron Age belonging to two different classes, namely “Type A” and “Type B”. By unveiling their manufacturing technology, we aim to inquire about the origins of these artifacts, their uses, and the relative historical period. To achieve our goals, we utilized two non-destructive techniques: X-ray microtomography (X-ray µCT) for 3D visualization of internal structures, and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDX) for the chemical composition analysis of the bronze objects. Notable differences emerge between the two artifacts; “Type A” displays well-defined anatomical details that are absent in “Type B”. Furthermore, 3-D reconstructions reveal additional information on production techniques and alteration effects, such as fractures and voids. Evidence suggests that both pendants were cast in molds, but “Type A” underwent additional modeling, resulting in detailed anatomical features, a functional necklet hole, and added elements like knees and arms. In contrast, “Type B” displays smooth forms with minimal post-casting processing. SEM-EDX analysis revealed notable differences in composition: “Type A” contains a higher proportion of copper and lower tin content. In contrast, “Type B” has significantly more tin and less copper, with similar lead content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2025.07.025
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traces of additive manufacturing in early iron age anthropomorphic pendants

V. Formoso, Andrea Smeriglio, Armando Taliano Grasso, Raffaele G. Agostino et al.
5 links
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
article

Traces of additive manufacturing in early iron age anthropomorphic pendants

V. Formoso, Andrea Smeriglio, Armando Taliano Grasso, Raffaele G. Agostino, R. Barberi, Federica Caputo, Raffaele Filosa
article en

Abstract

• Non-invasive X-ray µCT reveals manufacturing techniques in Iron Age bronze pendants. • SEM-EDX analysis uncovers alloy differences in Oenotrian pendants Type A and Type B . • Detailed post-casting processes distinguish elite-targeted Type A pendants. • Mass-produced Type B pendants linked to high-tin bronze and bivalve molds. • Study highlights Oenotrian-Sicilian cultural interplay through symbolic artifacts. Bronze pendants depicting anthropomorphic couples, dating back to the 8th century BC, were found in several protohistoric sites in Calabria. The historical and cultural context of the archaeological finds is linked to the Oenotrians, a population that settled in Southern Italy before Greek colonization. We present the results of the investigation on two bronze pendants dating back to the early Iron Age belonging to two different classes, namely “Type A” and “Type B”. By unveiling their manufacturing technology, we aim to inquire about the origins of these artifacts, their uses, and the relative historical period. To achieve our goals, we utilized two non-destructive techniques: X-ray microtomography (X-ray µCT) for 3D visualization of internal structures, and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDX) for the chemical composition analysis of the bronze objects. Notable differences emerge between the two artifacts; “Type A” displays well-defined anatomical details that are absent in “Type B”. Furthermore, 3-D reconstructions reveal additional information on production techniques and alteration effects, such as fractures and voids. Evidence suggests that both pendants were cast in molds, but “Type A” underwent additional modeling, resulting in detailed anatomical features, a functional necklet hole, and added elements like knees and arms. In contrast, “Type B” displays smooth forms with minimal post-casting processing. SEM-EDX analysis revealed notable differences in composition: “Type A” contains a higher proportion of copper and lower tin content. In contrast, “Type B” has significantly more tin and less copper, with similar lead content.

Journal of Cultural HeritageVol. 75
Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza (IT), University of Calabria (IT)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.