Children's Decision‐Making About Others Reflects Gender Stereotypes More Than Race: Evidence From a US Sample

ABSTRACT When categorizing faces by gender, children show evidence of intersectionality—miscategorizing Black females, but not White females, as male. Here we examined whether differential biases for Black and White females extend beyond perceptual tasks to judgments of social preferences. Children ( N = 97, ages 4–9 years; 59.8% White and 40.2% non‐White) in the United States evaluated and endorsed gender‐stereotyped clothing and activity choices for unfamiliar Black and White boys and girls. We found that children held robust gender stereotypes—evaluating female‐stereotyped options more positively for girls and male‐stereotyped options more positively for boys, regardless of race. More specifically, children's judgments of Black and White girls did not differ significantly for either clothing or activity choices. A small race effect emerged in activity evaluations, with White faces rated more positively than Black faces; however, this effect did not interact with gender, and diminished with age. These findings suggest that although 4‐ to 9‐year‐olds are sensitive to both the gender and race of unfamiliar children, intersectionality effects for Black females are not present at this age when evaluating social preferences—a result that contrasts with findings from perceptual categorization tasks. Potential explanations for the absence of intersectionality in children's decision‐making are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Development
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.70018
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's Decision‐Making About Others Reflects Gender Stereotypes More Than Race: Evidence From a US Sample

Stella F. Lourenco, Nikita Agarwal
1 links
Social Development
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Children's Decision‐Making About Others Reflects Gender Stereotypes More Than Race: Evidence From a US Sample

Stella F. Lourenco, Nikita Agarwal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT When categorizing faces by gender, children show evidence of intersectionality—miscategorizing Black females, but not White females, as male. Here we examined whether differential biases for Black and White females extend beyond perceptual tasks to judgments of social preferences. Children ( N = 97, ages 4–9 years; 59.8% White and 40.2% non‐White) in the United States evaluated and endorsed gender‐stereotyped clothing and activity choices for unfamiliar Black and White boys and girls. We found that children held robust gender stereotypes—evaluating female‐stereotyped options more positively for girls and male‐stereotyped options more positively for boys, regardless of race. More specifically, children's judgments of Black and White girls did not differ significantly for either clothing or activity choices. A small race effect emerged in activity evaluations, with White faces rated more positively than Black faces; however, this effect did not interact with gender, and diminished with age. These findings suggest that although 4‐ to 9‐year‐olds are sensitive to both the gender and race of unfamiliar children, intersectionality effects for Black females are not present at this age when evaluating social preferences—a result that contrasts with findings from perceptual categorization tasks. Potential explanations for the absence of intersectionality in children's decision‐making are discussed.

Social DevelopmentVol. 34(4)
Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.