NATO’s Strategic Culture(s). Public Opinion on Arms Transfers in Top Five Exporting Countries

Weapons transfers to foreign countries - a proliferation of conventional coercive technologies - became politicized in Western democracies in recent years, whereby fundamental tradeoffs between security-related, economic, and normative aspects are discussed. We propose that how these tradeoffs are solved is indicative of a more general strategic culture of countries. We investigate how the public views these tradeoffs and how homogeneous the underlying preference structure in NATO's top arms-exporting democracies (the US, UK, France, Germany, and Italy) is. Using a multidimensional measurement strategy via a conjoint experiment (N~10,000), we show that normative aspects predominate for all populations when forming preferences on export policies. However, we observe that Germany and Italy are essentially divided from the other three countries, regarding whether security aspects are considered in preference formation. Building on recent (machine learning) methods, we propose that this difference can be primarily attributed to the country of the respondents, indicating different strategic subcultures.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jwdsx_v1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NATO’s Strategic Culture(s). Public Opinion on Arms Transfers in Top Five Exporting Countries

Paul W. Thurner, Lukas Rudolph, Fabian Haggerty
1 citations
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
article

NATO’s Strategic Culture(s). Public Opinion on Arms Transfers in Top Five Exporting Countries

Paul W. Thurner, Lukas Rudolph, Fabian Haggerty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Weapons transfers to foreign countries - a proliferation of conventional coercive technologies - became politicized in Western democracies in recent years, whereby fundamental tradeoffs between security-related, economic, and normative aspects are discussed. We propose that how these tradeoffs are solved is indicative of a more general strategic culture of countries. We investigate how the public views these tradeoffs and how homogeneous the underlying preference structure in NATO's top arms-exporting democracies (the US, UK, France, Germany, and Italy) is. Using a multidimensional measurement strategy via a conjoint experiment (N~10,000), we show that normative aspects predominate for all populations when forming preferences on export policies. However, we observe that Germany and Italy are essentially divided from the other three countries, regarding whether security aspects are considered in preference formation. Building on recent (machine learning) methods, we propose that this difference can be primarily attributed to the country of the respondents, indicating different strategic subcultures.

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.