Cross-Cultural Validation and Application of the Thai CLEFT-Q in Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cleft Lip and Palate
This study evaluated the cross-cultural validity of the CLEFT-Q and measured patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes among patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Conducted as a Phase 2 study at a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand, the research involved 93 patients aged 8 to 29 years who had undergone cleft lip and/or cleft palate surgery. Participants completed the CLEFT-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure, to assess their satisfaction with appearance, health-related quality of life, and facial function. The comprehensibility of the CLEFT-Q was also evaluated. Rasch-transformed scores were analyzed, with statistical significance set at P≤0.05. Results showed moderate satisfaction with appearance (mean=53.8), with the highest scores for jaw appearance and the lowest for nostrils, teeth, and cleft scars. In contrast, satisfaction with facial function was higher (mean=70.9), and psychosocial and speech-related outcomes were favorable. The CLEFT-Q demonstrated high comprehensibility across all domains. The study concludes that the CLEFT-Q is a valid tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes in Thailand. While functional outcomes are generally positive, aesthetic satisfaction-particularly regarding nasal and dental appearance-requires further improvement. These findings highlight the importance of a greater emphasis on aesthetic outcomes in cleft care to more effectively meet patient expectations.
Authors
- Nachasa Khongchu
- Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6040-0784)
- Techin Wasinsangworn
- Min Yongsuvimol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8239-7321)
- Boonyaporn Kotistienkul
Institutions
- Siriraj Hospital (TH)
- Mahidol University (TH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011844
- Primary Topic
- Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00