Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Outpatient Obstetrical Clinic for Treatment of Iron‐Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy

Abstract Background Iron‐deficiency anemia (IDA) affects over one‐third of pregnant patients globally, contributing to severe maternal morbidity and adverse neonatal outcomes. Oral iron supplementation, while cost‐effective, is limited by poor absorption, significant gastrointestinal side effects, and poor adherence. The use of intravenous (IV) iron addresses many of these concerns, including eliminating GI side effects and the need for daily therapy. However, administration of IV iron in pregnant patients is typically restricted to specialized infusion centers or hospitals due to concerns about acute side effects, cost, resource utilization, the need for fetal heart rate monitoring, and extended infusion times. Methods This descriptive study evaluated the implementation, safety, and feasibility of outpatient IV iron infusions for pregnant patients with IDA, with maternal hemoglobin response and outcomes reported as secondary findings. Patients received a single or series of doses of IV iron spaced weekly, with hemoglobin levels monitored before and after treatment. No fetal heart tracing was performed. Antepartum patients treated with IV iron at our outpatient obstetric clinic from 2017 to 2024 were identified retrospectively, and their charts were reviewed. Results A total of 417 pregnant patients received IV iron (87.3% iron sucrose; 12.7% Ferric Carboxymaltose); 65.9% received ≥600 mg total dose (2–3 dose protocol), while 34.1% received lower cumulative doses (1–2 infusions). Therapy was well‐tolerated with no anaphylactic reactions reported. Side effects were experienced in only 11.5% of patients and were relatively minor, with dizziness (6.2%), headache (1.9%), and hypotension (1.7%) being the most common. Adverse maternal outcomes (PPH, ICU admission, blood transfusions, and re‐admissions) were low, particularly in patients who received the last infusion more than 10 days before delivery. Neonatal outcomes included a 7.4% NICU admission rate and a 3.5% rate of infants weighing less than 2500 g. Mean hemoglobin increased by 1.5 g/dL, consistent with prior studies. Conclusion This study demonstrates that IV iron therapy can be safely given in obstetrical clinics without significant maternal or fetal safety concerns. This obviates the need for more resource‐intensive and costly settings such as infusion or hospital‐based centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70067
Primary Topic
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Outpatient Obstetrical Clinic for Treatment of Iron‐Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy

G. Larry Maxwell, Ellen M. Murrin, Lillian Singer, Manal Kassab et al.
1 links
Pregnancy
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Outpatient Obstetrical Clinic for Treatment of Iron‐Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy

G. Larry Maxwell, Ellen M. Murrin, Lillian Singer, Manal Kassab, Olivia LeBeau, Antonio F. Saad, Scott Sullivan, George R. Saade, J. di Costanzo, Peyton Kalan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Iron‐deficiency anemia (IDA) affects over one‐third of pregnant patients globally, contributing to severe maternal morbidity and adverse neonatal outcomes. Oral iron supplementation, while cost‐effective, is limited by poor absorption, significant gastrointestinal side effects, and poor adherence. The use of intravenous (IV) iron addresses many of these concerns, including eliminating GI side effects and the need for daily therapy. However, administration of IV iron in pregnant patients is typically restricted to specialized infusion centers or hospitals due to concerns about acute side effects, cost, resource utilization, the need for fetal heart rate monitoring, and extended infusion times. Methods This descriptive study evaluated the implementation, safety, and feasibility of outpatient IV iron infusions for pregnant patients with IDA, with maternal hemoglobin response and outcomes reported as secondary findings. Patients received a single or series of doses of IV iron spaced weekly, with hemoglobin levels monitored before and after treatment. No fetal heart tracing was performed. Antepartum patients treated with IV iron at our outpatient obstetric clinic from 2017 to 2024 were identified retrospectively, and their charts were reviewed. Results A total of 417 pregnant patients received IV iron (87.3% iron sucrose; 12.7% Ferric Carboxymaltose); 65.9% received ≥600 mg total dose (2–3 dose protocol), while 34.1% received lower cumulative doses (1–2 infusions). Therapy was well‐tolerated with no anaphylactic reactions reported. Side effects were experienced in only 11.5% of patients and were relatively minor, with dizziness (6.2%), headache (1.9%), and hypotension (1.7%) being the most common. Adverse maternal outcomes (PPH, ICU admission, blood transfusions, and re‐admissions) were low, particularly in patients who received the last infusion more than 10 days before delivery. Neonatal outcomes included a 7.4% NICU admission rate and a 3.5% rate of infants weighing less than 2500 g. Mean hemoglobin increased by 1.5 g/dL, consistent with prior studies. Conclusion This study demonstrates that IV iron therapy can be safely given in obstetrical clinics without significant maternal or fetal safety concerns. This obviates the need for more resource‐intensive and costly settings such as infusion or hospital‐based centers.

PregnancyVol. 1(5)
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.