Measuring the Effects of Lean and Green Manufacturing Practices on the Triple Bottom Line

The need to take action toward sustainability is more important than ever, for environmental, economic, and societal reasons. There is demand for management models, such as Lean and Green Tools, that improve sustainable performance. The literature reveals that many Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) give insights about corresponding dimensions of sustainability. The main shortcomings are that many require a deep knowledge of material compositions, are not widely applicable, or measure effects over a very long period. This paper selected suitable key performance indicators for measuring the effects of implementing lean and green manufacturing principles in the respective sustainability dimensions. A case study revealed that the KPI Throughput is a valid method for the economic pillar. Also, the social KPIs of occupational safety, ergonomics, and workers satisfaction measured the effects of implementing Lean and Green practices in the social dimension. On the other hand, the environmental KPI amount of rejected parts showed limitations in a real-world setting because measured changes could not clearly be associated with the changes in the observed production system. Based on the gained knowledge, a model that identified Lean and Green Tools which positively impact the triple bottom line was applied and assessed.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21872/2024iise_8205
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Effects of Lean and Green Manufacturing Practices on the Triple Bottom Line

Leon Sundermann, Valerie Maier-Speredelozzi
Quality and Supply Management
article

Measuring the Effects of Lean and Green Manufacturing Practices on the Triple Bottom Line

Leon Sundermann, Valerie Maier-Speredelozzi
article en

Abstract

The need to take action toward sustainability is more important than ever, for environmental, economic, and societal reasons. There is demand for management models, such as Lean and Green Tools, that improve sustainable performance. The literature reveals that many Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) give insights about corresponding dimensions of sustainability. The main shortcomings are that many require a deep knowledge of material compositions, are not widely applicable, or measure effects over a very long period. This paper selected suitable key performance indicators for measuring the effects of implementing lean and green manufacturing principles in the respective sustainability dimensions. A case study revealed that the KPI Throughput is a valid method for the economic pillar. Also, the social KPIs of occupational safety, ergonomics, and workers satisfaction measured the effects of implementing Lean and Green practices in the social dimension. On the other hand, the environmental KPI amount of rejected parts showed limitations in a real-world setting because measured changes could not clearly be associated with the changes in the observed production system. Based on the gained knowledge, a model that identified Lean and Green Tools which positively impact the triple bottom line was applied and assessed.

Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.