Deployment of carbon capture and storage in the cement industry – Is the European Union up to shape?

• CCS is vital for near-zero cement emissions but faces several barriers. • CCS deployment relies on available infrastructure, regulation, and investment support. • Tailored CCS policies and storage capacity are critical for scaling up. • Varying national frameworks and geography affect CCS feasibility in the EU. The implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies in the cement industry is crucial for achieving near-zero emissions. However, CCS remains capital-intensive, with high operational costs, and faces significant market, investment, and infrastructure coordination barriers. Its deployment also depends on national and regional regulatory frameworks, given the need for CO₂ capture, transport, and storage. This study assesses the European Union’s (EU) readiness to implement CCS in the cement sector. Results indicate that the EU-27 cement industry could transition to near-zero emissions within a timeline aligned with EU climate targets, assuming: (i) the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) price rises in line with projections under the Fit for 55 package, and (ii) sufficient CO₂ storage capacity is made available. The findings underscore the need for complementary policy measures and CCS-specific regulatory frameworks to facilitate deployment. Although early and rapid implementation of CCS could deliver substantial climate benefits, it also poses challenges, including shortages of contractors, expertise, and materials. Moreover, historical investment patterns suggest that the required scale and pace of deployment would be unprecedented. While the EU has laid a strong foundation for the cement industry’s transition, CCS deployment potential differs among Member States, depending on the geographic distribution of cement plants and proximity to storage sites. National regulatory variations further complicate deployment. These factors must be addressed to enable a successful shift to near-zero emissions practices in the EU cement industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104442
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deployment of carbon capture and storage in the cement industry – Is the European Union up to shape?

Johan Rootzén, Filip Johnsson, Anna Emanuelsson
1 citations
International journal of greenhouse gas control
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
article

Deployment of carbon capture and storage in the cement industry – Is the European Union up to shape?

Johan Rootzén, Filip Johnsson, Anna Emanuelsson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• CCS is vital for near-zero cement emissions but faces several barriers. • CCS deployment relies on available infrastructure, regulation, and investment support. • Tailored CCS policies and storage capacity are critical for scaling up. • Varying national frameworks and geography affect CCS feasibility in the EU. The implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies in the cement industry is crucial for achieving near-zero emissions. However, CCS remains capital-intensive, with high operational costs, and faces significant market, investment, and infrastructure coordination barriers. Its deployment also depends on national and regional regulatory frameworks, given the need for CO₂ capture, transport, and storage. This study assesses the European Union’s (EU) readiness to implement CCS in the cement sector. Results indicate that the EU-27 cement industry could transition to near-zero emissions within a timeline aligned with EU climate targets, assuming: (i) the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) price rises in line with projections under the Fit for 55 package, and (ii) sufficient CO₂ storage capacity is made available. The findings underscore the need for complementary policy measures and CCS-specific regulatory frameworks to facilitate deployment. Although early and rapid implementation of CCS could deliver substantial climate benefits, it also poses challenges, including shortages of contractors, expertise, and materials. Moreover, historical investment patterns suggest that the required scale and pace of deployment would be unprecedented. While the EU has laid a strong foundation for the cement industry’s transition, CCS deployment potential differs among Member States, depending on the geographic distribution of cement plants and proximity to storage sites. National regulatory variations further complicate deployment. These factors must be addressed to enable a successful shift to near-zero emissions practices in the EU cement industry.

International journal of greenhouse gas controlVol. 146
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Institute of Innovation and Technology
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.