COMPARISON OF OPERATIVE TIME, POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND CONSUMPTION OF ANALGESIA IN JOEL COHN VERSUS PFANNENSTEIL INCISION FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL CESAREAN SECTION

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed major abdominal surgeries worldwide, playing a vital role in ensuring maternal and fetal safety during high-risk deliveries. With rising cesarean rates, optimizing surgical techniques has become increasingly important to improve maternal outcomes. Among the various types of abdominal incisions used, the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel approaches are commonly practiced, each with distinct procedural characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies are essential to identify the most efficient and least morbid option for routine obstetric care. Objective: To compare the Joel Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic consumption in women undergoing lower segment cesarean section. Methods: This randomized experimental study was conducted over 12 months at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lahore General Hospital. A total of 70 women undergoing primary lower segment cesarean section at >37 weeks of gestation were enrolled and randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group A underwent cesarean delivery via Joel-Cohen incision, while Group B received Pfannenstiel incision. Postoperative pain was measured at 6 and 12 hours using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Total analgesic consumption within the first 12 hours was also recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v23 with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Joel-Cohen group (3.48 ± 0.61 minutes) compared to the Pfannenstiel group (3.97 ± 0.78 minutes; p = 0.005). Pain scores at 6 hours (6.60 ± 0.69 vs. 7.34 ± 0.76; p < 0.001) and 12 hours (2.34 ± 0.48 vs. 3.34 ± 0.64; p < 0.001) were lower in the Joel-Cohen group. Mean analgesic consumption was also reduced (106.28 ± 9.42 mg vs. 125.71 ± 8.84 mg; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Joel-Cohen incision significantly reduced operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirements compared to the Pfannenstiel incision, indicating its potential as a preferred technique for lower segment cesarean section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/jmgj4902
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF OPERATIVE TIME, POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND CONSUMPTION OF ANALGESIA IN JOEL COHN VERSUS PFANNENSTEIL INCISION FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL CESAREAN SECTION

Komal Mannan, Sara Zafar
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

COMPARISON OF OPERATIVE TIME, POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND CONSUMPTION OF ANALGESIA IN JOEL COHN VERSUS PFANNENSTEIL INCISION FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL CESAREAN SECTION

Komal Mannan, Sara Zafar
article en

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed major abdominal surgeries worldwide, playing a vital role in ensuring maternal and fetal safety during high-risk deliveries. With rising cesarean rates, optimizing surgical techniques has become increasingly important to improve maternal outcomes. Among the various types of abdominal incisions used, the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel approaches are commonly practiced, each with distinct procedural characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies are essential to identify the most efficient and least morbid option for routine obstetric care. Objective: To compare the Joel Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic consumption in women undergoing lower segment cesarean section. Methods: This randomized experimental study was conducted over 12 months at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lahore General Hospital. A total of 70 women undergoing primary lower segment cesarean section at >37 weeks of gestation were enrolled and randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group A underwent cesarean delivery via Joel-Cohen incision, while Group B received Pfannenstiel incision. Postoperative pain was measured at 6 and 12 hours using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Total analgesic consumption within the first 12 hours was also recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v23 with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Joel-Cohen group (3.48 ± 0.61 minutes) compared to the Pfannenstiel group (3.97 ± 0.78 minutes; p = 0.005). Pain scores at 6 hours (6.60 ± 0.69 vs. 7.34 ± 0.76; p < 0.001) and 12 hours (2.34 ± 0.48 vs. 3.34 ± 0.64; p < 0.001) were lower in the Joel-Cohen group. Mean analgesic consumption was also reduced (106.28 ± 9.42 mg vs. 125.71 ± 8.84 mg; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Joel-Cohen incision significantly reduced operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirements compared to the Pfannenstiel incision, indicating its potential as a preferred technique for lower segment cesarean section.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(4 (Health and Rehabilitation))
Lahore General Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.