A Robust Hybrid Weighting Scheme Based on IQRBOW and Entropy for MCDM: Stability and Advantage Criteria in the VIKOR Framework

In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) environments characterized by uncertainty and data irregularities, the reliability of weighting methods becomes critical for ensuring robust and accurate decisions. This study introduces a novel hybrid objective weighting method-IQRBOW-E (Interquartile Range-Based Objective Weighting with Entropy)-which dynamically combines the statistical robustness of the IQRBOW method with the information sensitivity of Entropy through a tunable parameter β. The method allows decision-makers to flexibly control the trade-off between robustness and information contribution, enhancing the adaptability of decision support systems. A comprehensive experimental design involving ten simulation scenarios was implemented, in which the number of criteria, alternatives, and outlier ratios were varied. The IQRBOW-E method was integrated into the VIKOR framework and evaluated through average Q values, stability ratios, SRD scores, and the Friedman test. The results indicate that the proposed hybrid approach achieves superior decision stability and performance, particularly in data environments with increasing outlier contamination. Optimal β values were shown to shift systematically depending on data conditions, highlighting the model's sensitivity and adaptability. This study not only advances the methodological landscape of MCDM by introducing a parameterized hybrid weighting model but also contributes a robust and generalizable weighting infrastructure for modern decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27080867
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Robust Hybrid Weighting Scheme Based on IQRBOW and Entropy for MCDM: Stability and Advantage Criteria in the VIKOR Framework

Üzeyir Fidan, Ali Erbey, Cemil Gündüz
3 citations
Entropy
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
2.86
article

A Robust Hybrid Weighting Scheme Based on IQRBOW and Entropy for MCDM: Stability and Advantage Criteria in the VIKOR Framework

Üzeyir Fidan, Ali Erbey, Cemil Gündüz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) environments characterized by uncertainty and data irregularities, the reliability of weighting methods becomes critical for ensuring robust and accurate decisions. This study introduces a novel hybrid objective weighting method-IQRBOW-E (Interquartile Range-Based Objective Weighting with Entropy)-which dynamically combines the statistical robustness of the IQRBOW method with the information sensitivity of Entropy through a tunable parameter β. The method allows decision-makers to flexibly control the trade-off between robustness and information contribution, enhancing the adaptability of decision support systems. A comprehensive experimental design involving ten simulation scenarios was implemented, in which the number of criteria, alternatives, and outlier ratios were varied. The IQRBOW-E method was integrated into the VIKOR framework and evaluated through average Q values, stability ratios, SRD scores, and the Friedman test. The results indicate that the proposed hybrid approach achieves superior decision stability and performance, particularly in data environments with increasing outlier contamination. Optimal β values were shown to shift systematically depending on data conditions, highlighting the model's sensitivity and adaptability. This study not only advances the methodological landscape of MCDM by introducing a parameterized hybrid weighting model but also contributes a robust and generalizable weighting infrastructure for modern decision-making under uncertainty.

EntropyVol. 27(8)
Usak University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.