Cuasicristales y cuasicientíficos: cómo un relato del pasado puede darnos pistas sobre el presente de la ciencia
In 1982, Daniel Shechtman discovered quasicrystalline structures that would lead to a change in the very definition of crystal. Linus Pauling was a staunch opponent of this change, despite the evidence. Alan Mackay, on the other hand, had already predicted such structures when he spoke of widespread crystallography. This essay explores the contrast between the two and how the history of quasicrystals provides an opportunity to reflect on the basic principles of well-practiced science: scientific evidence, reproducibility, and correct attribution.
Authors
- Juan Manuel Ramírez-de-Arellano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-8032)
Institutions
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.62059/latarxiv.preprints.475
- Primary Topic
- Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00