Impact of Change in Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines for Infants Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

<b>Background</b>: In 2016, the neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) changed its recommendation to perform endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in non-vigorous neonates born through MSAF before and after the change in the NRP's recommendations. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single center assessing all neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation with MSAF in 2010-2015 (pre-implementation of new guidelines) and 2017-2022 (post-implementation of new guidelines). <b>Results</b>: Neonates receiving tracheal suctioning were more likely to be diagnosed with MAS (29.3% vs. 19.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and PPHN (8.9% vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.003) and more likely to receive surfactant (7.6% vs. 3.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our institution, non-vigorous neonates born via MSAF after the change in NRP guidelines were less likely to be diagnosed with MAS and PPHN and were less likely to receive surfactant. Our study supports current NRP guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081072
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Change in Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines for Infants Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

Munmun Rawat, Praveen Chandrasekharan, James D Shelton, Hamza Abbasi
Children
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

Impact of Change in Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines for Infants Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

Munmun Rawat, Praveen Chandrasekharan, James D Shelton, Hamza Abbasi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: In 2016, the neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) changed its recommendation to perform endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in non-vigorous neonates born through MSAF before and after the change in the NRP's recommendations. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single center assessing all neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation with MSAF in 2010-2015 (pre-implementation of new guidelines) and 2017-2022 (post-implementation of new guidelines). <b>Results</b>: Neonates receiving tracheal suctioning were more likely to be diagnosed with MAS (29.3% vs. 19.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and PPHN (8.9% vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.003) and more likely to receive surfactant (7.6% vs. 3.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our institution, non-vigorous neonates born via MSAF after the change in NRP guidelines were less likely to be diagnosed with MAS and PPHN and were less likely to receive surfactant. Our study supports current NRP guidelines.

ChildrenVol. 12(8)
Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
University at Buffalo
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Change in Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines for Infants Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid — Munmun Rawat, Praveen Chandrasekharan, et al. · Children (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS