Consensus Statements on Airway Clearance Interventions in Intubated Critically Ill Patients—Protocol for a Delphi Study

Intubated critically ill patients are susceptible to secretion accumulation because of compromised airway clearance. Various airway clearance interventions are employed to prevent complications arising from mucus retention. This Delphi study aims to collect global opinions in an international expert panel of ICU professionals on the usefulness of these various airway clearance interventions. A steering committee performed a literature search informing the formulation of statements. Statements are grouped into two distinct parts: (1) Humidification and Nebulization, and (2) Suctioning and Mucus mobilization techniques. For each part, a diverse panel of 30-40 experts will be selected, with concerted effort to involve experts from various medical specialties involved in airway clearance methods. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) or 7-point Likert-scale statements will be used in the iterative Delphi rounds to reach consensus on various airway clearance interventions. Rounds will continue until stability is achieved for all statements. Consensus will be deemed achieved when a choice in MCQs or a Likert-scale statement achieves ≥75% agreement or disagreement. Starting from the second round of the Delphi process, stability will be assessed using non-parametric χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stability will be defined by a <i>p</i>-value of ≥0.05.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life15081292
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus Statements on Airway Clearance Interventions in Intubated Critically Ill Patients—Protocol for a Delphi Study

Deven Juneja, Prashant Nasa, Stéphan Ehrmann, Frederique Paulus et al.
3 citations
Life
Delphi Technique in Research
12.60
article

Consensus Statements on Airway Clearance Interventions in Intubated Critically Ill Patients—Protocol for a Delphi Study

Deven Juneja, Prashant Nasa, Stéphan Ehrmann, Frederique Paulus, Willemke Stilma, Marcus Josephus Schultz, George Ntoumenopoulos, Andrea A. Esmeijer, Lorenzo Ball, Denise Battaglini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Intubated critically ill patients are susceptible to secretion accumulation because of compromised airway clearance. Various airway clearance interventions are employed to prevent complications arising from mucus retention. This Delphi study aims to collect global opinions in an international expert panel of ICU professionals on the usefulness of these various airway clearance interventions. A steering committee performed a literature search informing the formulation of statements. Statements are grouped into two distinct parts: (1) Humidification and Nebulization, and (2) Suctioning and Mucus mobilization techniques. For each part, a diverse panel of 30-40 experts will be selected, with concerted effort to involve experts from various medical specialties involved in airway clearance methods. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) or 7-point Likert-scale statements will be used in the iterative Delphi rounds to reach consensus on various airway clearance interventions. Rounds will continue until stability is achieved for all statements. Consensus will be deemed achieved when a choice in MCQs or a Likert-scale statement achieves ≥75% agreement or disagreement. Starting from the second round of the Delphi process, stability will be assessed using non-parametric χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stability will be defined by a <i>p</i>-value of ≥0.05.

LifeVol. 15(8)
Université de Tours (FR), Inserm (FR), Mahidol University (TH), Royal Perth Hospital (AU), New Cross Hospital (GB), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), University of Oxford (GB), Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours (FR), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Genoa (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Delphi Technique in Research
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.