Mobility of Ediacaran organisms: A review

The Ediacaran Period was a time when life got big with confirmed fossils of megascopic algae, lichens, sponges, and worms. But which of these kinds of organisms are the most likely biological affinities for enigmatic vendobionts such as Dickinsonia ? These iconic quilted organisms have no clear modern relatives, but interpretation as animals has been based in part on putative evidence that they could move of their own accord. These supposed trace fossils of vendobionts, including ‘footprints’ and ‘feeding traces’, are reexamined here for Dickinsonia, Quaestio , and Kimberella . Supposed footprints are more likely tool marks of specimens displaced by wind or water on melting ice, and feeding traces are more likely bundles of ice crystals formed from supercooled water within cavities. Funisia was a sessile creature thought to be able to wave about within the water column, but confinement of the fossils to thin layers is evidence that it was prostrate on the ground. Dickinsonia, Quaestio, Kimberella, and Funisia are found in rocks with sedimentological, petrographic, and geochemical evidence of soil formation, and may have been sessile lichens of Ediacaran terrestrial communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/05529360251353060
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobility of Ediacaran organisms: A review

Gregory J. Retallack
2 citations
Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
8.66
article

Mobility of Ediacaran organisms: A review

Gregory J. Retallack
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Ediacaran Period was a time when life got big with confirmed fossils of megascopic algae, lichens, sponges, and worms. But which of these kinds of organisms are the most likely biological affinities for enigmatic vendobionts such as Dickinsonia ? These iconic quilted organisms have no clear modern relatives, but interpretation as animals has been based in part on putative evidence that they could move of their own accord. These supposed trace fossils of vendobionts, including ‘footprints’ and ‘feeding traces’, are reexamined here for Dickinsonia, Quaestio , and Kimberella . Supposed footprints are more likely tool marks of specimens displaced by wind or water on melting ice, and feeding traces are more likely bundles of ice crystals formed from supercooled water within cavities. Funisia was a sessile creature thought to be able to wave about within the water column, but confinement of the fossils to thin layers is evidence that it was prostrate on the ground. Dickinsonia, Quaestio, Kimberella, and Funisia are found in rocks with sedimentological, petrographic, and geochemical evidence of soil formation, and may have been sessile lichens of Ediacaran terrestrial communities.

Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India
University of Oregon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
8.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mobility of Ediacaran organisms: A review — Gregory J. Retallack · Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS