Fiscal science and technology expenditure, industrial agglomeration and green total factor productivity: Experiences from China

• The Fiscal Science and Technology Expenditure (FSTE) and industrial agglomeration are conducive to Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP). • FSTE can indirectly affect GTFP through industrial agglomeration. • When there are differences in economic development and regional scale, there are significant differences in the effects of FSTE and industrial agglomeration on GTFP. • FSTE inhibits industrial agglomeration in regions with high levels of economic development, but the mediating effect of industrial agglomeration on GTFP is positive only in regions with low and medium levels of development. The Fiscal Science and Technology Expenditure (FSTE) serves as a crucial policy instrument for promoting green technology innovation, with demonstrable effects on industrial agglomeration and Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP). This paper systematically describes the relationship between FSTE, industrial agglomeration and GTFP, and then empirically analyses the mediating role among the three, combined with panel data from 288 Chinese cities. Overall, FSTE and industrial agglomeration are conducive to GTFP, and FSTE can indirectly affect GTFP through industrial agglomeration. When there are differences in economic development and regional scale, there are significant differences in the effects of FSTE and industrial agglomeration on GTFP. FSTE inhibits industrial agglomeration in regions with high levels of economic development, but the mediating effect of industrial agglomeration on GTFP is prominent in regions with low and medium levels of development. For large cities, the effect of FSTE on industrial agglomeration is not significant and industrial agglomeration does not affect GTFP, but the mediating effect about industrial agglomeration is significant in small and medium-sized cities. In eastern China, FSTE has a hindering effect on GTFP through industrial agglomeration, but it has a promoting effect in central and western China. This paper helps to understand the role of science and technology spending on green production as well as agglomeration of enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108199
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fiscal science and technology expenditure, industrial agglomeration and green total factor productivity: Experiences from China

Lijun Hu, Lei Chen, Zhenzhen Rao, Fang He
2 citations
Finance research letters
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
article

Fiscal science and technology expenditure, industrial agglomeration and green total factor productivity: Experiences from China

Lijun Hu, Lei Chen, Zhenzhen Rao, Fang He
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• The Fiscal Science and Technology Expenditure (FSTE) and industrial agglomeration are conducive to Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP). • FSTE can indirectly affect GTFP through industrial agglomeration. • When there are differences in economic development and regional scale, there are significant differences in the effects of FSTE and industrial agglomeration on GTFP. • FSTE inhibits industrial agglomeration in regions with high levels of economic development, but the mediating effect of industrial agglomeration on GTFP is positive only in regions with low and medium levels of development. The Fiscal Science and Technology Expenditure (FSTE) serves as a crucial policy instrument for promoting green technology innovation, with demonstrable effects on industrial agglomeration and Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP). This paper systematically describes the relationship between FSTE, industrial agglomeration and GTFP, and then empirically analyses the mediating role among the three, combined with panel data from 288 Chinese cities. Overall, FSTE and industrial agglomeration are conducive to GTFP, and FSTE can indirectly affect GTFP through industrial agglomeration. When there are differences in economic development and regional scale, there are significant differences in the effects of FSTE and industrial agglomeration on GTFP. FSTE inhibits industrial agglomeration in regions with high levels of economic development, but the mediating effect of industrial agglomeration on GTFP is prominent in regions with low and medium levels of development. For large cities, the effect of FSTE on industrial agglomeration is not significant and industrial agglomeration does not affect GTFP, but the mediating effect about industrial agglomeration is significant in small and medium-sized cities. In eastern China, FSTE has a hindering effect on GTFP through industrial agglomeration, but it has a promoting effect in central and western China. This paper helps to understand the role of science and technology spending on green production as well as agglomeration of enterprises.

Finance research lettersVol. 85
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Wuhan Business University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.