“Do You Want to Continue?”—Coordinating the Closing of Conversations and Managing Face Concerns

This study investigates how participants manage the decision to end or continue their conversation when directly asked about their preferences. The dataset consists of 19 conversations where the researcher explicitly asked if the two participants wanted to continue their conversation, thus causing some potential interactional trouble for the participants. The participants' decision to continue was intertwined with the local sequential context in which the question occurred. The results show how participants follow the norms prioritizing face‐saving even in a quasi‐natural setting and illuminate how micro‐level interaction order can outweigh individual preferences in ending conversations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolic Interaction
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.70013
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Do You Want to Continue?”—Coordinating the Closing of Conversations and Managing Face Concerns

Emmi Koskinen
Symbolic Interaction
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

“Do You Want to Continue?”—Coordinating the Closing of Conversations and Managing Face Concerns

Emmi Koskinen
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how participants manage the decision to end or continue their conversation when directly asked about their preferences. The dataset consists of 19 conversations where the researcher explicitly asked if the two participants wanted to continue their conversation, thus causing some potential interactional trouble for the participants. The participants' decision to continue was intertwined with the local sequential context in which the question occurred. The results show how participants follow the norms prioritizing face‐saving even in a quasi‐natural setting and illuminate how micro‐level interaction order can outweigh individual preferences in ending conversations.

Symbolic Interaction
University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Academy of Finland, Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.