Bayesian Estimation of Paleoearthquake Magnitudes in the Central Apennines

ABSTRACT Paleoseismic data provide critical constraints on earthquake recurrence where instrumental records are limited, but magnitude estimation from geological evidence requires careful treatment of measurement uncertainties. We develop a Bayesian method with application to the estimation of paleoearthquake magnitudes in the central Apennines, Italy, by jointly analyzing rupture length (L), throw (S), and age (T) data from field investigations. Our framework incorporates empirical scaling relationships with their full uncertainty, time-dependent preservation probabilities, and physically informed priors. After calibrating the best model, our analysis yields magnitude estimates that show agreement with existing parametric catalogs for some historical and instrumental earthquakes. The method is applied to 44 paleoevents reported in a new database (PaleoEcA), with 2σ credible intervals mostly in the range ±(0.3–0.7), reflecting measurement uncertainties and preservation bias. We observe that results depend critically on the chosen scaling laws (tested against, e.g., Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Leonard, 2010). This approach provides a reproducible framework, also publicly available as a MATLAB software (PaleoBAYES), for quantifying uncertainties in paleoseismic databases. Discrepancies with some catalog estimates highlight the importance of systematic, uncertainty-aware methods when deriving magnitudes from paleoseismological data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250194
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Estimation of Paleoearthquake Magnitudes in the Central Apennines

Davide Zaccagnino, Michele M. C. Carafa, Deborah Di Naccio
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Bayesian Estimation of Paleoearthquake Magnitudes in the Central Apennines

Davide Zaccagnino, Michele M. C. Carafa, Deborah Di Naccio
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Paleoseismic data provide critical constraints on earthquake recurrence where instrumental records are limited, but magnitude estimation from geological evidence requires careful treatment of measurement uncertainties. We develop a Bayesian method with application to the estimation of paleoearthquake magnitudes in the central Apennines, Italy, by jointly analyzing rupture length (L), throw (S), and age (T) data from field investigations. Our framework incorporates empirical scaling relationships with their full uncertainty, time-dependent preservation probabilities, and physically informed priors. After calibrating the best model, our analysis yields magnitude estimates that show agreement with existing parametric catalogs for some historical and instrumental earthquakes. The method is applied to 44 paleoevents reported in a new database (PaleoEcA), with 2σ credible intervals mostly in the range ±(0.3–0.7), reflecting measurement uncertainties and preservation bias. We observe that results depend critically on the chosen scaling laws (tested against, e.g., Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Leonard, 2010). This approach provides a reproducible framework, also publicly available as a MATLAB software (PaleoBAYES), for quantifying uncertainties in paleoseismic databases. Discrepancies with some catalog estimates highlight the importance of systematic, uncertainty-aware methods when deriving magnitudes from paleoseismological data.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
European Commission, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.