Method comparison of diabetes mellitus associated autoantibodies in serum specimens

Our study reveals significant and clinically relevant discrepancies in the detection of GADA and IA-2A when comparing CLIA devices to the ELISA method routinely used in our laboratory. For individual antibodies up to 65 % of patients who tested positive using ELISA showed negative or borderline results on at least one CLIA device. These deviations are unpredictable and cannot be detected through standard calibration and internal control procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0137
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Method comparison of diabetes mellitus associated autoantibodies in serum specimens

Anna E. Rapp, Stefanie Busch, Peter Findeisen, Alexander Lenard
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Diabetes and associated disorders
article

Method comparison of diabetes mellitus associated autoantibodies in serum specimens

Anna E. Rapp, Stefanie Busch, Peter Findeisen, Alexander Lenard
article en

Abstract

Our study reveals significant and clinically relevant discrepancies in the detection of GADA and IA-2A when comparing CLIA devices to the ELISA method routinely used in our laboratory. For individual antibodies up to 65 % of patients who tested positive using ELISA showed negative or borderline results on at least one CLIA device. These deviations are unpredictable and cannot be detected through standard calibration and internal control procedures.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Vol. 63(12)
Dr Kolbach Kliniek (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Diabetes and associated disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.