Evaluation of Valid Thickness in ASTM Standard Tensile Specimen Considering Stress Triaxiality and Strain Path

This study investigates the valid thickness range for ASTM E8 tensile specimens under plane-stress uniaxial tension conditions. Finite element simulations were performed on specimens with varying thicknesses, and stress triaxiality and strain path were analyzed as the primary evaluation criteria. An ideal uniaxial tension state was defined by a stress triaxiality of approximately 0.333 and strain path of -0.5. The results indicate that specimens with a thickness of up to 8.0 mm satisfy both these conditions. Outside this range, notable differences in stress triaxiality and strain path between the surface and mid-thickness were observed, indicating a departure from the intended uniaxial tension state. Thus, this study provides a guideline for determining the appropriate specimen thickness to ensure accurate tensile testing under plane-stress uniaxial tension conditions. The proposed methodology may also be applied to evaluate the validity of tensile specimens in other mechanical testing conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7735/ksmte.2025.34.4.243
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Valid Thickness in ASTM Standard Tensile Specimen Considering Stress Triaxiality and Strain Path

Junseop Yun, Yujin Chae, Minki Kim, Jin‐Soo Park
Journal of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Evaluation of Valid Thickness in ASTM Standard Tensile Specimen Considering Stress Triaxiality and Strain Path

Junseop Yun, Yujin Chae, Minki Kim, Jin‐Soo Park
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the valid thickness range for ASTM E8 tensile specimens under plane-stress uniaxial tension conditions. Finite element simulations were performed on specimens with varying thicknesses, and stress triaxiality and strain path were analyzed as the primary evaluation criteria. An ideal uniaxial tension state was defined by a stress triaxiality of approximately 0.333 and strain path of -0.5. The results indicate that specimens with a thickness of up to 8.0 mm satisfy both these conditions. Outside this range, notable differences in stress triaxiality and strain path between the surface and mid-thickness were observed, indicating a departure from the intended uniaxial tension state. Thus, this study provides a guideline for determining the appropriate specimen thickness to ensure accurate tensile testing under plane-stress uniaxial tension conditions. The proposed methodology may also be applied to evaluate the validity of tensile specimens in other mechanical testing conditions.

Journal of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology EngineersVol. 34(4)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Valid Thickness in ASTM Standard Tensile Specimen Considering Stress Triaxiality and Strain Path — Junseop Yun, Yujin Chae, et al. · Journal of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS