Assessing the impact of AI tools on mobility and daily assistance for children with down syndrome in Saudi Arabia

This mixed-methods study investigated the impact of AI-powered assistive technology on mobility, communication, and daily living assistance in children with Down syndrome in Saudi Arabia. We looked at information from 123 carers (47 who used AI and 76 who did not) with similar child backgrounds through structured surveys and seven detailed interviews, using careful statistical methods and thorough initial assessments. AI users found it much easier to do things compared to those who didn't use AI, showing a medium improvement in moving around (Cohen's d = 0.65) and communicating (d = 0.72) and a large improvement in household tasks (d = 0.83). Among AI users only, perceived effectiveness was rated moderately high for daily independence (M = 3.85, SD = 0.93) and mobility (M = 3.78, SD = 1.18). Seven interviewed carers reported subjective stress reduction when children used AI tools independently. This secondary benefit extends the impact of AI beyond direct child outcomes to broader family well-being. Primary barriers to adoption included financial constraints (74.46%), insufficient technical support (38.29%), and technology adaptation difficulties (31.91%). Cultural perceptions and the absence of Arabic-localised AI solutions pose additional challenges that align with the global patterns identified in cross-cultural research. Although we did not directly test cross-cultural comparisons, this study suggests that Saudi Arabia's adoption barriers may share similarities with international patterns. Policy recommendations include establishing government subsidies covering 60-80% of AI tool costs, mandating insurance coverage, creating regional AI support centres, and prioritising the development of culturally adapted Arabic language solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15085-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of AI tools on mobility and daily assistance for children with down syndrome in Saudi Arabia

Sohil Alqazlan, Houcine Benlaria, Adel Saber Alanazi
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
11.55
article

Assessing the impact of AI tools on mobility and daily assistance for children with down syndrome in Saudi Arabia

Sohil Alqazlan, Houcine Benlaria, Adel Saber Alanazi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This mixed-methods study investigated the impact of AI-powered assistive technology on mobility, communication, and daily living assistance in children with Down syndrome in Saudi Arabia. We looked at information from 123 carers (47 who used AI and 76 who did not) with similar child backgrounds through structured surveys and seven detailed interviews, using careful statistical methods and thorough initial assessments. AI users found it much easier to do things compared to those who didn't use AI, showing a medium improvement in moving around (Cohen's d = 0.65) and communicating (d = 0.72) and a large improvement in household tasks (d = 0.83). Among AI users only, perceived effectiveness was rated moderately high for daily independence (M = 3.85, SD = 0.93) and mobility (M = 3.78, SD = 1.18). Seven interviewed carers reported subjective stress reduction when children used AI tools independently. This secondary benefit extends the impact of AI beyond direct child outcomes to broader family well-being. Primary barriers to adoption included financial constraints (74.46%), insufficient technical support (38.29%), and technology adaptation difficulties (31.91%). Cultural perceptions and the absence of Arabic-localised AI solutions pose additional challenges that align with the global patterns identified in cross-cultural research. Although we did not directly test cross-cultural comparisons, this study suggests that Saudi Arabia's adoption barriers may share similarities with international patterns. Policy recommendations include establishing government subsidies covering 60-80% of AI tool costs, mandating insurance coverage, creating regional AI support centres, and prioritising the development of culturally adapted Arabic language solutions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Jouf University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), King Salman Center for Disability Research (SA)
King Salman Center for Disability Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
11.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.