On-farm experimentation of anaerobic digestate distribution methods for advancing circular economy in the agroecosystem

Abstract Purpose This study evaluates the effectiveness of various anaerobic digestate distribution methods, including liquid digestate with a nitrification inhibitor, liquid digestate applied with variable rate application (VRA), and solid digestate, compared to mineral fertilizer. The objective was to assess their agronomic performance, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and environmental impact in winter wheat production within a circular economy framework. Method A two-year on-farm experiment was conducted across two farms covering a total area of 47 hectares. The treatments evaluated included liquid digestate with nitrification inhibitor (LD+), liquid digestate with variable rate application (VRA), liquid digestate with both nitrification inhibitor and VRA, solid digestate (SD) and mineral fertilizer (MF) with or without VRA. The study measured wheat yields, protein content, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and compared the agro-environmental sustainability of digestate and mineral fertilizer applications. Results Winter wheat production under digestate applications achieved yields (>5.9 t ha −1 ) and protein content (>5.3%) comparable to mineral fertilizer. The mineral fertilizer showed higher NUE (69%) than all digestate fractions, with LD+ at 43% and SD at 25%. The liquid digestate application with VRA increased NUE to 49%, but the nitrification inhibitor had no significant effect on NUE.The agronomic performance of solid digestate was comparable to mineral fertilizer at one site but lower at the other. However, solid digestate exhibited lower agro-environmental sustainability. Conclusion Liquid fractions of anaerobic digestate can serve as alternatives to mineral fertilizers, providing promising agronomic results when combined with precision farming techniques such as VRA. However, their NUE and overall performance were lower than mineral fertilizers, with variability across sites due to soil conditions and environmental factors. Solid digestate demonstrated mixed agronomic outcomes and raised concerns regarding its longer-term impact on soil sustainability. Further long-term studies are needed to assess its full effects on soil structure and organic matter dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precision Agriculture
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10275-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On-farm experimentation of anaerobic digestate distribution methods for advancing circular economy in the agroecosystem

Francesco Meneghetti, Ilaria Piccoli, Jacopo Carlo Ferlito, Francesco Morari et al.
1 citations
Precision Agriculture
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

On-farm experimentation of anaerobic digestate distribution methods for advancing circular economy in the agroecosystem

Francesco Meneghetti, Ilaria Piccoli, Jacopo Carlo Ferlito, Francesco Morari, Federico Grillo, Silvia Obber, Luca Saccardo, Francesca Ragazzi, Tiziano Bonato, Ivan Furlanetto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study evaluates the effectiveness of various anaerobic digestate distribution methods, including liquid digestate with a nitrification inhibitor, liquid digestate applied with variable rate application (VRA), and solid digestate, compared to mineral fertilizer. The objective was to assess their agronomic performance, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and environmental impact in winter wheat production within a circular economy framework. Method A two-year on-farm experiment was conducted across two farms covering a total area of 47 hectares. The treatments evaluated included liquid digestate with nitrification inhibitor (LD+), liquid digestate with variable rate application (VRA), liquid digestate with both nitrification inhibitor and VRA, solid digestate (SD) and mineral fertilizer (MF) with or without VRA. The study measured wheat yields, protein content, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and compared the agro-environmental sustainability of digestate and mineral fertilizer applications. Results Winter wheat production under digestate applications achieved yields (>5.9 t ha −1 ) and protein content (>5.3%) comparable to mineral fertilizer. The mineral fertilizer showed higher NUE (69%) than all digestate fractions, with LD+ at 43% and SD at 25%. The liquid digestate application with VRA increased NUE to 49%, but the nitrification inhibitor had no significant effect on NUE.The agronomic performance of solid digestate was comparable to mineral fertilizer at one site but lower at the other. However, solid digestate exhibited lower agro-environmental sustainability. Conclusion Liquid fractions of anaerobic digestate can serve as alternatives to mineral fertilizers, providing promising agronomic results when combined with precision farming techniques such as VRA. However, their NUE and overall performance were lower than mineral fertilizers, with variability across sites due to soil conditions and environmental factors. Solid digestate demonstrated mixed agronomic outcomes and raised concerns regarding its longer-term impact on soil sustainability. Further long-term studies are needed to assess its full effects on soil structure and organic matter dynamics.

Precision AgricultureVol. 26(5)
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte (IT), University of Padua (IT), SdPhotonics (United States) (US), Ambiente Italia (Italy) (IT), Istituto Sperimentale per la Frutticoltura (IT), Sacmi (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.