Promoting Environmental Performance through Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting

Institutional pressures in the environmental management accounting process through coercive pressure, normal pressure and mimetic pressure that could foster practices and significantly heightens the likelihood of achieving firms' environmental performance. Although a substantial body of literature has outlined the theoretical mechanisms through which institutional pressures in the environmental management accounting process might boost firms' environmental performance, the generally inconsistent and unclear findings of empirical studies have kept researchers interested in exploring this topic further. The present study has investigated the simultaneous impact of coercive pressure, normal pressure, and mimetic pressure of institutional pressures on firms' environmental performance. Based on the institutional theory and the literature review, this study has examined the direct effect of institutional pressures on environmental management accounting, as well as the direct relationship between environmental management accounting and environmental performance. In addition, environmental management accounting has been determined to be mediators in linking the coercive pressure, normal pressure and mimetic pressure of institutional pressures and their effects on firms' environmental performance. JEL Codes: M40, M41, Q56. Keywords: Institutional pressures; environmental management accounting; environmental performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2025.1(1)
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting Environmental Performance through Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting

Ridzwana Mohd Said, Haslinah Muhamad, Zaidi Mat Daud, Fan Jing
Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Promoting Environmental Performance through Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting

Ridzwana Mohd Said, Haslinah Muhamad, Zaidi Mat Daud, Fan Jing
article en

Abstract

Institutional pressures in the environmental management accounting process through coercive pressure, normal pressure and mimetic pressure that could foster practices and significantly heightens the likelihood of achieving firms' environmental performance. Although a substantial body of literature has outlined the theoretical mechanisms through which institutional pressures in the environmental management accounting process might boost firms' environmental performance, the generally inconsistent and unclear findings of empirical studies have kept researchers interested in exploring this topic further. The present study has investigated the simultaneous impact of coercive pressure, normal pressure, and mimetic pressure of institutional pressures on firms' environmental performance. Based on the institutional theory and the literature review, this study has examined the direct effect of institutional pressures on environmental management accounting, as well as the direct relationship between environmental management accounting and environmental performance. In addition, environmental management accounting has been determined to be mediators in linking the coercive pressure, normal pressure and mimetic pressure of institutional pressures and their effects on firms' environmental performance. JEL Codes: M40, M41, Q56. Keywords: Institutional pressures; environmental management accounting; environmental performance.

Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences ProceedingVol. 17(1)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.