Challenging behaviour or everyday resistance? Experienced power and physical restraints at Danish residential homes for people with intellectual disabilities

The Danish welfare state is often praised for its foundational principles of solidarity, equality, and liberalism. However, for individuals with disabilities, the use of force has consistently been a part of their experience. Most recently, a revision of the Social Service Act in 2024 broadened the legal framework for the use of physical restraint on individuals with intellectual disabilities living in residential care settings. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is twofold: (1) to examine the historical foundations of the special regulations surrounding the use of coercion, and (2) to explore how individuals with intellectual disabilities perceive the conflicts that result in the application of physical restraints. By employing the concept of ‘everyday resistance’, we understand the residents’ behaviour in situations of conflict as political rather than pathological. This perspective prompts a critical re-examination of the way social services for people with intellectual disabilities are structured and organised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2025.2548464
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging behaviour or everyday resistance? Experienced power and physical restraints at Danish residential homes for people with intellectual disabilities

Jesper Kragh, Stine Grønbæk Jensen
Disability & Society
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Challenging behaviour or everyday resistance? Experienced power and physical restraints at Danish residential homes for people with intellectual disabilities

Jesper Kragh, Stine Grønbæk Jensen
article en

Abstract

The Danish welfare state is often praised for its foundational principles of solidarity, equality, and liberalism. However, for individuals with disabilities, the use of force has consistently been a part of their experience. Most recently, a revision of the Social Service Act in 2024 broadened the legal framework for the use of physical restraint on individuals with intellectual disabilities living in residential care settings. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is twofold: (1) to examine the historical foundations of the special regulations surrounding the use of coercion, and (2) to explore how individuals with intellectual disabilities perceive the conflicts that result in the application of physical restraints. By employing the concept of ‘everyday resistance’, we understand the residents’ behaviour in situations of conflict as political rather than pathological. This perspective prompts a critical re-examination of the way social services for people with intellectual disabilities are structured and organised.

Disability & SocietyVol. 41(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.