Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Laparoscopic appendectomy (LsA) is a standard acute surgical procedure typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is associated with side effects such as hemodynamic instability and postoperative nausea/vomiting. Regional anesthesia (RA) has gained attention as an effective alternative in such surgeries, as it reduces surgical stress responses, provides adequate postoperative analgesia, and promotes early mobilization. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the combined use of spinal anesthesia (SA) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in LsA procedures. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study included 220 patients who underwent LsA between 2020 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 110) received bilateral TAPB, and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 110) received unilateral TAPB, both under SA. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and outcomes such as time to first analgesic requirement, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction were recorded. <b>Results:</b> This study evaluated the effects of SA combined with TAPB in LsA. Bilateral TAPB significantly prolonged the time to first analgesic request (13.7 vs. 12.1 h; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and reduced analgesic requirements (<i>p</i> = 0.008) compared to unilateral TAPB. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group 1 at the 9th and 12th hours postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>p</i> = 0.039). Although overall satisfaction scores were similar, a higher proportion of patients in Group 1 reported being "very satisfied" or "excellent" (55.5% vs. 42.7%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The combination of spinal anesthesia and bilateral TAPB is a safe and effective anesthetic strategy for LsA. Compared to unilateral TAPB, it offers superior postoperative analgesia and improved patient satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Ahmet Atlas, Selçuk Seçilmiş, Mahmut Alp Karahan, Evren Büyükfırat et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Ahmet Atlas, Selçuk Seçilmiş, Mahmut Alp Karahan, Evren Büyükfırat, Nuray Altay, Abdulhakim Şengel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Laparoscopic appendectomy (LsA) is a standard acute surgical procedure typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is associated with side effects such as hemodynamic instability and postoperative nausea/vomiting. Regional anesthesia (RA) has gained attention as an effective alternative in such surgeries, as it reduces surgical stress responses, provides adequate postoperative analgesia, and promotes early mobilization. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the combined use of spinal anesthesia (SA) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in LsA procedures. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study included 220 patients who underwent LsA between 2020 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 110) received bilateral TAPB, and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 110) received unilateral TAPB, both under SA. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and outcomes such as time to first analgesic requirement, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction were recorded. <b>Results:</b> This study evaluated the effects of SA combined with TAPB in LsA. Bilateral TAPB significantly prolonged the time to first analgesic request (13.7 vs. 12.1 h; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and reduced analgesic requirements (<i>p</i> = 0.008) compared to unilateral TAPB. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group 1 at the 9th and 12th hours postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>p</i> = 0.039). Although overall satisfaction scores were similar, a higher proportion of patients in Group 1 reported being "very satisfied" or "excellent" (55.5% vs. 42.7%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The combination of spinal anesthesia and bilateral TAPB is a safe and effective anesthetic strategy for LsA. Compared to unilateral TAPB, it offers superior postoperative analgesia and improved patient satisfaction.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(17)
Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), Harran University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.