Evaluating an agriculture and natural resources leadership development program utilizing the CIPP model

The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model to evaluate agriculture and natural resources (ANR) leadership development programs (LDP). We evaluated Washington AgForestry Leadership Program, one of over 50 similarly structured ANR LDPs around the world, and used the CIPP model to determine the extent to which the leadership program is meeting both the current and future needs and expectations of stakeholders. We found the CIPP model to be an appropriate and adequate evaluation framework that resulted in robust data collection and analysis, leading to meaningful recommendations for Washington AgForestry. Overall, stakeholders support the current content and structure of the program and find it to be fulfilling the stated mission. Simultaneously, areas for immediate improvement, future growth, and longevity were noted. We recommend that other ANR LDPs conduct robust program evaluations using the CIPP model. Applying a consistent evaluation process to similarly structured ANR LDPs would build a valuable knowledge base of outcomes, impacts, and potential needs of such programs. Minimally, programs should develop and implement regular formative and summative evaluations to better understand and document program outcomes and impacts. Program directors should utilize evaluation data to continually improve their programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advancements in Agricultural Development
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v6i3.591
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating an agriculture and natural resources leadership development program utilizing the CIPP model

Rachel Biderman, Laura L. Greenhaw
Advancements in Agricultural Development
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

Evaluating an agriculture and natural resources leadership development program utilizing the CIPP model

Rachel Biderman, Laura L. Greenhaw
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model to evaluate agriculture and natural resources (ANR) leadership development programs (LDP). We evaluated Washington AgForestry Leadership Program, one of over 50 similarly structured ANR LDPs around the world, and used the CIPP model to determine the extent to which the leadership program is meeting both the current and future needs and expectations of stakeholders. We found the CIPP model to be an appropriate and adequate evaluation framework that resulted in robust data collection and analysis, leading to meaningful recommendations for Washington AgForestry. Overall, stakeholders support the current content and structure of the program and find it to be fulfilling the stated mission. Simultaneously, areas for immediate improvement, future growth, and longevity were noted. We recommend that other ANR LDPs conduct robust program evaluations using the CIPP model. Applying a consistent evaluation process to similarly structured ANR LDPs would build a valuable knowledge base of outcomes, impacts, and potential needs of such programs. Minimally, programs should develop and implement regular formative and summative evaluations to better understand and document program outcomes and impacts. Program directors should utilize evaluation data to continually improve their programs.

Advancements in Agricultural DevelopmentVol. 6(3)
University of Florida (US)
Washington State University, Washington State Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating an agriculture and natural resources leadership development program utilizing the CIPP model — Rachel Biderman, Laura L. Greenhaw · Advancements in Agricultural Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS