The Mind Lab: Thought Experiments as a Means to Teaching Science Effectively and Efficiently

Western educational philosophy has long emphasized the importance of first-hand observation in learning. This view, however, overlooks another important form of learning, sometimes called learning by thinking. Here, we compared three conditions: instruction using thought experiments (Thought Experiments condition), instruction using real experiments (Real Experiments condition), and no instruction (Baseline condition). A total of 100 children (MAge = 84.79 months; 43 girls; predominantly White) were assigned to the conditions. All participants completed a pre-training physics assessment, received physics instruction (Thought and Real Experiments conditions only), and completed a post-training assessment. Results showed that only children in the Real and Thought Experiments conditions improved from pre- to post-training. Critically, there was no significant difference between the two instructional methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jr4nx_v2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mind Lab: Thought Experiments as a Means to Teaching Science Effectively and Efficiently

Igor Bascandziev, Caren M. Walker, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Adani B Abutto
1 citations
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
article

The Mind Lab: Thought Experiments as a Means to Teaching Science Effectively and Efficiently

Igor Bascandziev, Caren M. Walker, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Adani B Abutto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Western educational philosophy has long emphasized the importance of first-hand observation in learning. This view, however, overlooks another important form of learning, sometimes called learning by thinking. Here, we compared three conditions: instruction using thought experiments (Thought Experiments condition), instruction using real experiments (Real Experiments condition), and no instruction (Baseline condition). A total of 100 children (MAge = 84.79 months; 43 girls; predominantly White) were assigned to the conditions. All participants completed a pre-training physics assessment, received physics instruction (Thought and Real Experiments conditions only), and completed a post-training assessment. Results showed that only children in the Real and Thought Experiments conditions improved from pre- to post-training. Critically, there was no significant difference between the two instructional methods.

Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Mind Lab: Thought Experiments as a Means to Teaching Science Effectively and Efficiently — Igor Bascandziev, Caren M. Walker, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS