The Mind Lab: Thought Experiments as a Means to Teaching Science Effectively and Efficiently
Western educational philosophy has long emphasized the importance of first-hand observation in learning. This view, however, overlooks another important form of learning, sometimes called learning by thinking. Here, we compared three conditions: instruction using thought experiments (Thought Experiments condition), instruction using real experiments (Real Experiments condition), and no instruction (Baseline condition). A total of 100 children (MAge = 84.79 months; 43 girls; predominantly White) were assigned to the conditions. All participants completed a pre-training physics assessment, received physics instruction (Thought and Real Experiments conditions only), and completed a post-training assessment. Results showed that only children in the Real and Thought Experiments conditions improved from pre- to post-training. Critically, there was no significant difference between the two instructional methods.
Authors
- Igor Bascandziev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-8728)
- Caren M. Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-8611)
- Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-9345)
- Adani B Abutto
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jr4nx_v2
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.11