Trophic niche overlap decreases in related mesocarnivore species

In natural environments, competition between species is a crucial factor for the survival or demise of populations. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that promote species coexistence is crucial in community and evolutionary ecology. The phylogenetic limiting to similarity hypothesis (PLSH) posits that closely related species should experience greater competition due to niche conservatism, leading to higher overlap in resource use. However, studies have shown mixed results regarding the influence of phylogenetic distance and other abiotic and biotic factors on interspecific competition. This study, which is based on an extensive bibliographic review of more than 200 sources over nearly five decades, explores the role of phylogenetic relatedness, body mass differences, and environmental factors such as primary productivity, in shaping trophic niche overlap among mesocarnivores across ten global biomes. Our results suggest that phylogenetic distance and body mass differences are the most significant predictors of trophic niche overlap, while environmental factors like primary productivity also play a crucial role. These findings highlight the complexity of species interactions, emphasizing that trophic niche overlap is influenced by a combination of factors. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics governing species coexistence and the assembly of ecological communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.11324
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trophic niche overlap decreases in related mesocarnivore species

Emílio Virgós, Javier Hernández‐Hernández, Carlos Sarabia, José María Gil‐Sánchez et al.
Oikos
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Trophic niche overlap decreases in related mesocarnivore species

Emílio Virgós, Javier Hernández‐Hernández, Carlos Sarabia, José María Gil‐Sánchez, Jennifer A. Leonard, Imanol Miqueleiz
article en

Abstract

In natural environments, competition between species is a crucial factor for the survival or demise of populations. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that promote species coexistence is crucial in community and evolutionary ecology. The phylogenetic limiting to similarity hypothesis (PLSH) posits that closely related species should experience greater competition due to niche conservatism, leading to higher overlap in resource use. However, studies have shown mixed results regarding the influence of phylogenetic distance and other abiotic and biotic factors on interspecific competition. This study, which is based on an extensive bibliographic review of more than 200 sources over nearly five decades, explores the role of phylogenetic relatedness, body mass differences, and environmental factors such as primary productivity, in shaping trophic niche overlap among mesocarnivores across ten global biomes. Our results suggest that phylogenetic distance and body mass differences are the most significant predictors of trophic niche overlap, while environmental factors like primary productivity also play a crucial role. These findings highlight the complexity of species interactions, emphasizing that trophic niche overlap is influenced by a combination of factors. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics governing species coexistence and the assembly of ecological communities.

OikosVol. 2025(11)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Cornell University (US), Brown University (US), University College Copenhagen (DK), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Brown University, Universidad de Granada
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.