The Historic Advisory Opinion on Palestine: An Overview of Indonesia's Submissions and the Way Forward

On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rendered a historic ruling which declared that Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) is unlawful. While this historic Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences Arising from Israel’s Policies and Practices in the OPT, including East Jerusalem (Advisory Opinion) should be celebrated, much more needs to be done in order to fully realize the decisions contained therein. This article presents an overview of the Republic of Indonesia’s legal arguments submitted to the ICJ concerning the request for an Advisory Opinion. Indonesia, a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause, contends that Israel’s policies and practices constitute violations of international law, particularly due to its prolonged and illegal occupation over the OPT. This article seeks to analyze Indonesia’s submissions to the ICJ in light of the Advisory Opinion rendered, and looks at previous practices of the ICJ regarding advisory opinions to shed light on the way forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol22.4.1927
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Historic Advisory Opinion on Palestine: An Overview of Indonesia's Submissions and the Way Forward

Indra Rosandry, Aloysius Selwas Taborat, Kadek Denny Baskara Adiputra
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Asian Studies and History
article

The Historic Advisory Opinion on Palestine: An Overview of Indonesia's Submissions and the Way Forward

Indra Rosandry, Aloysius Selwas Taborat, Kadek Denny Baskara Adiputra
article en

Abstract

On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rendered a historic ruling which declared that Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) is unlawful. While this historic Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences Arising from Israel’s Policies and Practices in the OPT, including East Jerusalem (Advisory Opinion) should be celebrated, much more needs to be done in order to fully realize the decisions contained therein. This article presents an overview of the Republic of Indonesia’s legal arguments submitted to the ICJ concerning the request for an Advisory Opinion. Indonesia, a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause, contends that Israel’s policies and practices constitute violations of international law, particularly due to its prolonged and illegal occupation over the OPT. This article seeks to analyze Indonesia’s submissions to the ICJ in light of the Advisory Opinion rendered, and looks at previous practices of the ICJ regarding advisory opinions to shed light on the way forward.

Indonesian Journal of International LawVol. 22(4)
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.