Efficacy of Clinical Scoring in Diagnosing Malaria

Introduction: Malaria is one of the most widespread and deadly infectious diseases globally, primarily caused by Plasmodium parasites transmitted through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the efficacy of clinical scoring in diagnosing malaria in patients. Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at Niazi Medical and Dental College, Sargodha during June 2023 to July 2024. The study involved 185 patients presenting with symptoms of fever and other malaria-associated clinical features at the healthcare facility. Results: Data were collected from 185 patients, with a mean age of 32.4±3.71 years, ranging from 5 to 65 years. The majority of participants were adults aged 13–45 years (64.9%), while children (≤ 12 years) comprised 16.2%, and older adults (≥ 46 years) accounted for 18.9%. Of the total participants, 56.8% were male, and 43.2% were female. A significant portion had a travel history to malaria-endemic areas (45.9%), and 37.8% had a history of previous malaria. Common presenting symptoms included fever (100%), chills (75.7%), and headache (67.6%), while physical findings such as splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were observed in 21.6% and 13.5% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: It is concluded that the clinical scoring system is a highly effective tool for diagnosing malaria, demonstrating excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. It can serve as a reliable screening method, especially in resource-limited settings, where laboratory diagnostics may not always be readily available.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32s.8416
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Clinical Scoring in Diagnosing Malaria

Izhar Ali, Mohammad Helal Uddin, Saadia Sherazi, Zarmast Khan et al.
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Efficacy of Clinical Scoring in Diagnosing Malaria

Izhar Ali, Mohammad Helal Uddin, Saadia Sherazi, Zarmast Khan, Mian Rahmat Zeb, Muhammed Basit
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Malaria is one of the most widespread and deadly infectious diseases globally, primarily caused by Plasmodium parasites transmitted through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the efficacy of clinical scoring in diagnosing malaria in patients. Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at Niazi Medical and Dental College, Sargodha during June 2023 to July 2024. The study involved 185 patients presenting with symptoms of fever and other malaria-associated clinical features at the healthcare facility. Results: Data were collected from 185 patients, with a mean age of 32.4±3.71 years, ranging from 5 to 65 years. The majority of participants were adults aged 13–45 years (64.9%), while children (≤ 12 years) comprised 16.2%, and older adults (≥ 46 years) accounted for 18.9%. Of the total participants, 56.8% were male, and 43.2% were female. A significant portion had a travel history to malaria-endemic areas (45.9%), and 37.8% had a history of previous malaria. Common presenting symptoms included fever (100%), chills (75.7%), and headache (67.6%), while physical findings such as splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were observed in 21.6% and 13.5% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: It is concluded that the clinical scoring system is a highly effective tool for diagnosing malaria, demonstrating excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. It can serve as a reliable screening method, especially in resource-limited settings, where laboratory diagnostics may not always be readily available.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(32S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.