Responses to climate change – insights and limitations from herbaceous plant model species

Herbaceous plant species have been the focus of extensive, long-term research into climate change responses, but there has been little effort to synthesize results and predicted outlooks. This primer summarizes research on climate change responses for eight intensively studied herbaceous plant species. We establish generalities across species, examine limitations, and propose a path forward. Climate change has reduced fitness, caused maladaptation, and/or led to population declines in at least part of the range of all six forb species. Plasticity alone is likely not sufficient to allow adjustment to shifting climates. Most model species also have spatially restricted dispersal that may limit genetic and evolutionary rescue. These results are surprising, given that these species are generally widespread, span large elevation ranges, and have substantial genetic and phenotypic variation. The focal species have diverse life histories, reproductive strategies, and habitats, and most are native to North America. Thus, species that are rare, habitat specialists, or endemic to other parts of the world are poorly represented in this review. We encourage researchers to design demographic and field experiments that evaluate plant traits and fitness in contemporary and potential future conditions across the full life cycle, and that consider biotic interactions in climate change responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70468
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses to climate change – insights and limitations from herbaceous plant model species

Thomas Juenger, Seema N. Sheth, Joseph D. Napier, Jill T. Anderson et al.
5 citations
New Phytologist
Species Distribution and Climate Change
9.19
article

Responses to climate change – insights and limitations from herbaceous plant model species

Thomas Juenger, Seema N. Sheth, Joseph D. Napier, Jill T. Anderson, Moisés Expósito‐Alonso, David A. Moeller, Meghan L. Avolio, Amy L. Angert, Diane R. Campbell, Nicholas J. Kooyers
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Herbaceous plant species have been the focus of extensive, long-term research into climate change responses, but there has been little effort to synthesize results and predicted outlooks. This primer summarizes research on climate change responses for eight intensively studied herbaceous plant species. We establish generalities across species, examine limitations, and propose a path forward. Climate change has reduced fitness, caused maladaptation, and/or led to population declines in at least part of the range of all six forb species. Plasticity alone is likely not sufficient to allow adjustment to shifting climates. Most model species also have spatially restricted dispersal that may limit genetic and evolutionary rescue. These results are surprising, given that these species are generally widespread, span large elevation ranges, and have substantial genetic and phenotypic variation. The focal species have diverse life histories, reproductive strategies, and habitats, and most are native to North America. Thus, species that are rare, habitat specialists, or endemic to other parts of the world are poorly represented in this review. We encourage researchers to design demographic and field experiments that evaluate plant traits and fitness in contemporary and potential future conditions across the full life cycle, and that consider biotic interactions in climate change responses.

New PhytologistVol. 248(2)
University of Minnesota (US), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Georgia (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Irvine University (US), University of Baltimore (US), University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Division of Integrative Organismal Systems, Division of Environmental Biology
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
9.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.