Multi-Environmental Reliability Evaluation for Complex Equipment: A Strict Intuitionistic Fuzzy Distance Measure-Based Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Framework
The theoretical reliability of complex equipment often significantly deviates from real-world performance due to the inherent influence of diverse environmental and operational factors, making scientific reliability evaluation particularly challenging. This study proposes a multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) evaluation framework based on a strict intuitionistic fuzzy distance and an improved TOPSIS approach. First, an improved strict intuitionistic fuzzy distance measure (ISIFDisM) is rigorously developed to overcome the limitations of existing methods, exhibiting high robustness, monotonicity, and discriminability. Second, building upon ISIFDisM, a systematic MAGDM evaluation model is constructed, comprising three key steps: (1) data acquisition through structured questionnaire surveys; (2) attribute weights determined using the entropy weight method; and (3) alternative ranking through normalized priority coefficients derived from intuitionistic fuzzy distance calculations. Third, the proposed framework is applied to a practical case study focused on reliability assessment of ship equipment, enabling effective ranking of various marine engines. Finally, through static comparative analyses and dynamic scenario simulations, the feasibility, robustness, and methodological superiority of the proposed framework are thoroughly validated.
Authors
- Zhaiming Peng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-4769)
- Longlong Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-6209)
- Wenhe Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-7076)
Institutions
- Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Anhui Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Machines
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13080744
- Primary Topic
- Risk and Safety Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science